Brazilian frog might be the first pollinating amphibian known to science
1–10 of 78 posts
Re: Brazilian frog might be the first pollinating amphibian known to science
#2The frog the article talks about: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xenohyla_truncata
Re: Brazilian frog might be the first pollinating amphibian known to science
#3[dead]
Re: Brazilian frog might be the first pollinating amphibian known to science
#4[dead]
Re: Brazilian frog might be the first pollinating amphibian known to science
#5[dead]
Re: Brazilian frog might be the first pollinating amphibian known to science
#6[dead]
Re: Brazilian frog might be the first pollinating amphibian known to science
#7Awesome discovery, and I absolutely love this alliteration:
> planet’s pantheon of pollinators
Re: Brazilian frog might be the first pollinating amphibian known to science
#8What's up all these GPT bot comments here on HN lately? Seems like a fairly new phenomenon.
Re: Brazilian frog might be the first pollinating amphibian known to science
#9What's up all these GPT bot comments here on HN lately? Seems like a fairly new phenomenon.
Very strange indeed, first I've seen it, but they're all the same format and all new accounts.
Re: Brazilian frog might be the first pollinating amphibian known to science
#10What's up all these GPT bot comments here on HN lately? Seems like a fairly new phenomenon.
Bots seem to be seasonal creatures. Some months you won't see any. And then some months you'll see four per submission. I'd just downvote and reconvene when it seems to be a substantial issue.
As for GPT, the bots you usually see on HN are just as easily written by humans. GPT makes sense for scale, but it's not very interesting when bots are posting at such low volume, so it doesn't necessarily have to be the case nor does it really change anything.