Live data from Hacker News

NYPD urges citizens to buy AirTags to fight surge in car thefts

arstechnica.com

181–190 of 439 posts

Re: NYPD urges citizens to buy AirTags to fight surge in car thefts

#181
post #14

[flagged]

> Defund the police. Not for any socialist reasons, or because they're racist or whatever people are angry about - but because they are so incompetent at their job Who on Earth thinks the answer to attracting competent people to a middle-class job is lowering pay?

Defunding the police does not necessarily mean lowering their pay.

https://mudcompany.thecomicseries.com/comics/148/

Re: NYPD urges citizens to buy AirTags to fight surge in car thefts

#182

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The whole thing about the mayor and NYPD telling everyone who watches or listens to the news to buy a 30 dollar gps patch that someone can put under some car carpeting anywhere in said car should be enough to discourage most car thieves with 2 or more active brain cells, but hey, I'm an idealist.

On Amazon I see them as low as 5 for $13 {GPS tracking tags. No need to buy Apple}

I'm not sure what you're seeing but you're definitely not seeing genuine AirTags 5 for $13. More likely you're seeing the AirTag holders for that price.

Re: NYPD urges citizens to buy AirTags to fight surge in car thefts

#183

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Apple does not spy on me Apple can be compelled to spy on you[0]. > and does not sell my information to advertisers Apple is an advertiser. [0] https://www.apple.com/legal/transparency/us.html

They don't even have to be compelled, they can simply be asked to share users' private data.

They can also use commercially-available hardware like the Greykey to bruteforce iPhone and Android logins without Apple or Google's permission whatsoever.

Isn't modern technology fun?

Re: NYPD urges citizens to buy AirTags to fight surge in car thefts

#184
post #77
post #9

i am unsure how AirTags can be recommended by anyone in any situation to prevent theft. their "anti-tracking" features make them completely useless in any situation where theft is involved (or theft happens after loosing the item). the thief is alerted to their presence automatically and can disable them quickly. perfect for thieves! AirTags can only be used for misplaced items, any utility for situations involving t…

I'm glad someone brought this up. I'm the CEO of Tile and we launched an anti-theft feature for this reason. We allow you to turn off anti-stalking features if you agree to strict penalties for misuse and verify yourself with a real ID. https://chrishulls.medium.com/tile-is-taking-a-different-app...

Wow this should be higher up. Also, have you tried emailing someone in Adams' office?

Re: NYPD urges citizens to buy AirTags to fight surge in car thefts

#186

From TFA Mayor Adams was asked during the press conference if AirTags work with Android (they don't). "Why would anyone have one [an Android phone]?" Mayor Adams responded. Oh and given that this in New York we're talking about here, the vigilante mob are gonna go wild for this, especially after Citizen worked out so well .... But by last month, Frame was enthusiastically backing the idea of manhunts, according to sc…

> Why would anyone have one [an Android phone]?" Mayor Adams responded This is a New Yorker’s response to a stupid question. AirTags have a recognised brand. Messaging “buy AirTags” comes through cleanly in a way an inclusive statement would not. Given nobody is burning city funds for this, it’s literally a PSA, a reporter asking the mayor technical questions the answer to which they know is fine to be answered dismi…

It's a legitimate question. Why is the mayor of NYC shilling a product? NYC is one of the worlds largest city governments so It's not out of the realm of possibility that this is a native ad for I-Phones.

Re: NYPD urges citizens to buy AirTags to fight surge in car thefts

#187
post #75

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Again... this level of ignorance and short-sightedness is surprising coming from someone in such a position of authority He was making a joke, playing into the Android vs iPhone eternal war. But as someone who spent years on iPhone, then switched fully to Android for 5 devices across 4 years, and now back to iPhone..... I actually think the ignorance is the other way (Android users who have never tried iPhone as th…

> But as someone who spent years on iPhone, then switched fully to Android for 5 devices across 4 years Perhaps you don't know how to pick phones? My last Android device lasted 4 years (in fact it is still going strong after I installed DivestOS, became my backup phone), and my new device will probably last a long time too. Each for a fraction of the price charged by Apple.

> Perhaps you don't know how to pick phones?

Right. They’re doing it wrong?

Re: NYPD urges citizens to buy AirTags to fight surge in car thefts

#188

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Apple does not spy on me Apple can be compelled to spy on you[0]. > and does not sell my information to advertisers Apple is an advertiser. [0] https://www.apple.com/legal/transparency/us.html

They don't even have to be compelled, they can simply be asked to share users' private data.

Apple is very clear about what they have access to, and what they do not. They cannot share what they do not have, or do not have the encryption keys to.

Re: NYPD urges citizens to buy AirTags to fight surge in car thefts

#189

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why would I choose an Android phone? Apple does not spy on me, and does not sell my information to advertisers. An iPhone SE is $429, or can be financed at the same price , with zero interest, at $17.87 for 24 months. Why would I want to join Google’s advertiser-driven ecosystem, and voluntarily make myself into Google’s product?

> Apple does not spy on me Apple can be compelled to spy on you[0]. > and does not sell my information to advertisers Apple is an advertiser. [0] https://www.apple.com/legal/transparency/us.html

> Apple can be compelled to spy on you[0].

It’s dishonest to equate lawful warrants with Google’s targeted advertising and exploitation of our information.

Furthermore, Apple is clear about what information they have access to, and what information they don’t, and have consistently, year-over-year, reduced the information they actually have access to.

> Apple is an advertiser.

This is another disingenuous false equivalency. Apple does not gather personal information from our devices for advertising, and always requires explicit opt-in before making use of any data provided to them through the use of their services.

Re: NYPD urges citizens to buy AirTags to fight surge in car thefts

#190

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why would I choose an Android phone? Apple does not spy on me, and does not sell my information to advertisers. An iPhone SE is $429, or can be financed at the same price , with zero interest, at $17.87 for 24 months. Why would I want to join Google’s advertiser-driven ecosystem, and voluntarily make myself into Google’s product?

>Apple does not spy on me There's something ironic to find this comment on a video of a former cop surrounded by other cops touting the surveillance features Apple's product offers exclusively.

Is it even true? It seems hard to believe Apple doesn't spy on people or sell information to advertisers.
Post reply on HN