Live data from Hacker News

Significant breakthrough in search for Parkinson's biomarker

michaeljfox.org

1–10 of 196 posts

Re: Significant breakthrough in search for Parkinson's biomarker

#3
Not to unnecessarily shit on the parade, but I’m not sure this is by itself all that exciting, and calling it a breakthrough seems like an exaggeration. Diagnosing Parkinson’s isn’t really an issue - worst case you give the putative sufferer Levadopa and see if they respond. If they do, they’ve got Parkinson’s.

Not sure how much this really changes the time horizon for an actual treatment. It’s progress, ostensibly, but I’d quibble with categorising it as a breakthrough.

Re: Significant breakthrough in search for Parkinson's biomarker

#5
If anyone wants to help the cause, PPMI is a large scale study funded by the Michael J Fox Foundation to help find early biomarkers.

Even if you have no history of Parkinson’s in your family, you can participate in the study which is primarily surveys. It's easy to participate, and can help find more early indications of a horrible disease.

https://www.michaeljfox.org/ppmi-clinical-study

Re: Significant breakthrough in search for Parkinson's biomarker

#6
I just found out about Thiamine (vitamin B1) megadose therapy for Parkinson's:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3762356/

Another study: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26505466/

> Conclusions: Administration of parenteral high-dose thiamine was effective in reversing PD motor and nonmotor symptoms. The clinical improvement was stable over time in all the patients. From our clinical evidence, we hypothesize that a dysfunction of thiamine-dependent metabolic processes could cause selective neural damage in the centers typically affected by this disease and might be a fundamental molecular event provoking neurodegeneration. Thiamine could have both restorative and neuroprotective action in PD.

This experience report of halting Parkinson's: https://youtu.be/iuSOQOTyB9w

Re: Significant breakthrough in search for Parkinson's biomarker

#7
post #3

Not to unnecessarily shit on the parade, but I’m not sure this is by itself all that exciting, and calling it a breakthrough seems like an exaggeration. Diagnosing Parkinson’s isn’t really an issue - worst case you give the putative sufferer Levadopa and see if they respond. If they do, they’ve got Parkinson’s. Not sure how much this really changes the time horizon for an actual treatment. It’s progress, ostensibly,…

Finding subtypes before clear symptoms is obviously superior for testing earlier intervention and allowing patients to make a living will with fuller faculties.

Re: Significant breakthrough in search for Parkinson's biomarker

#8
post #3

Not to unnecessarily shit on the parade, but I’m not sure this is by itself all that exciting, and calling it a breakthrough seems like an exaggeration. Diagnosing Parkinson’s isn’t really an issue - worst case you give the putative sufferer Levadopa and see if they respond. If they do, they’ve got Parkinson’s. Not sure how much this really changes the time horizon for an actual treatment. It’s progress, ostensibly,…

> I’m not sure this is by itself all that exciting

This actually seems pretty significant.

1) It gets us closer to understanding the pathology:

>> It also suggests that alpha-synuclein aggregation in spinal fluid is not a life-long trait but rather acquired as part of a disease biology process that ultimately gives rise to symptoms.

2) It gives us a higher resolution of detection.

>> αSyn-SAA can distinguish Parkinson’s from control volunteers with a stunningly robust sensitivity of 88 percent and specificity of 96 percent.

3) It shows different disease subtypes or mechanisms:

>> These results suggest that not all cases of clinical Parkinson’s symptoms are associated with the accumulation of alpha-synuclein aggregates as detected by this assay, and that LRRK2 variant carriers, in particular, may not show this pathology.

4) It gets us earlier signal:

>> This finding suggests that synuclein pathology could be detectable by this assay earlier than dopamine dysfunction is seen with DAT imaging, extending the window in which it may be possible to intervene with preventive therapies.

This is a valuable tool that will shed light on the entire disease pathology and guide further research and investigation into treatments.

Re: Significant breakthrough in search for Parkinson's biomarker

#9
post #6

I just found out about Thiamine (vitamin B1) megadose therapy for Parkinson's: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3762356/ Another study: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26505466/ > Conclusions: Administration of parenteral high-dose thiamine was effective in reversing PD motor and nonmotor symptoms. The clinical improvement was stable over time in all the patients. From our clinical evidence, we hypothesiz…

God bless you for sharing this. Thank you.

Re: Significant breakthrough in search for Parkinson's biomarker

#10
post #6

I just found out about Thiamine (vitamin B1) megadose therapy for Parkinson's: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3762356/ Another study: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26505466/ > Conclusions: Administration of parenteral high-dose thiamine was effective in reversing PD motor and nonmotor symptoms. The clinical improvement was stable over time in all the patients. From our clinical evidence, we hypothesiz…

If this Was discovered 10 years ago, I’m assuming it must be fairly limited in helping, or the results haven’t lasted or something?
Post reply on HN