Live data from Hacker News

New York to ban natural gas, including stoves, in new buildings

nytimes.com

721–730 of 1001 posts

Re: New York to ban natural gas, including stoves, in new buildings

#721

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I am pro banning gas stoves but that doesn’t mean electric is great. Electric sucks ass, even ignoring some things you just cannot do without gas (like make proper rotis) their heating is slow and uneven. At the least induction is fast.

If you’re talking about roti flatbread. It’s always cooked on a flat surface so gas/electric has 0 influence on it.

Roti Indian style is finished off on top of a direct flame. Pretty impossible to fully emulate it without gas.

Re: New York to ban natural gas, including stoves, in new buildings

#722
post #673

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I am pro banning gas stoves but that doesn’t mean electric is great. Electric sucks ass, even ignoring some things you just cannot do without gas (like make proper rotis) their heating is slow and uneven. At the least induction is fast.

Not to invalidate your point (because I have never made rotis) but this suspiciously sounds like you need better cookware.

There’s definitely a level of confidently-incorrect cringe here. Please tell me how I should do this https://youtu.be/lsI08y6jwaQ with better cookware.

Re: New York to ban natural gas, including stoves, in new buildings

#723
IMHO: The government including EPA has been hijacked by corporate interests that destroy the environment literally on an industrial scale. The same club of multinationals have expropriated our middle class and sent it to China, which is profitable in part because of the lack of environmental regulations which manages to be even worse than the hollowed out ones we enjoy here.

So while all this is going on we have the bullshit with straws, our printers turning themselves off constantly, and now this, as if people in their homes are the lever that needs to be pulled to fix the environment. It’s a farce and a diversion from the corruption that’s actually contributing to environmental damage.

Electric and gas stoves are not analogs, at all. Bet your ass the politicians pushing this for optics will NOT be using an electric stove at home.

Re: New York to ban natural gas, including stoves, in new buildings

#724
post #644

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Gas alliances are significantly cheaper to run. Also perform better. Gas dryers are awesome compared to electric for example. Plus electric goes out often. Gas doesn’t.

> Plus electric goes out often. On the US east coast it does not. Very rare occurrence, to the point where a major blackout is a noteworthy event.

[dead]

Re: New York to ban natural gas, including stoves, in new buildings

#725
post #692

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Are they? New Zealand is ludicrous marked up in terms of consumer goods, and I’ve just checked pricing. The cheapest is resistive electric. Then fractionally more is gas. Induction costs approximately double for 4 hobs (for 2 hobs it’s about 50% more than resistive). If you count installation, both electric options are going to be less expensive than gas. If the big cable needs running for induction, the cost might b…

Gas is rare and expensive in NZ, I knew very few people who had it. In NYC every house does. My clothes dryer runs off gas. It’s dirt cheap.

Gas cooktops were very popular and are still common in New Zealand. It used to be legal (within building code) to run a small 9kg gas bottle (BBQ size) under your cooktop in a kitchen cupboard, so very cheap to install. Resistive cooktops were and are pretty aweful.

Gas indoors is now considered a health hazard even with range hood, and while you can still buy gas cooktops, I haven't seen a new build with gas in a long time.

Re: New York to ban natural gas, including stoves, in new buildings

#726

This regulation feels quite frustrating to me, and several comments in this thread illustrate why. This change is being promoted as a critical step in the fight against climate change. (See most news articles over the past two years covering this.) But when you dig into the details, it seems like the regulation may not have much effect on climate change at all. When you point this out to advocates, you'll get an enti…

> This change is being promoted as a critical step in the fight against climate change. 27 years from now, when we're supposedly going to be "net zero", do we really want to be supporting a bunch of natural gas infrastructure? Or should we start making that expensive infrastructure not necessary? 1. Most homes built now will be around in 27 years, and still in good shape. 2. Building and maintaining natural gas infra…

> 4. It's just not worth it to support gas infrastructure just for gas stoves.

My oven/cooktop is gas, along with my on-demand hot water heater, and fire place. I also have a connection outside that I use for my grill. I think my heatpump has gas backup for when it's really cold.

Gas powers a lot more than just stoves.

Re: New York to ban natural gas, including stoves, in new buildings

#727

IMHO: The government including EPA has been hijacked by corporate interests that destroy the environment literally on an industrial scale. The same club of multinationals have expropriated our middle class and sent it to China, which is profitable in part because of the lack of environmental regulations which manages to be even worse than the hollowed out ones we enjoy here. So while all this is going on we have the…

Meanwhile here in europe electric stoves work just fine, cook faster, are cleaner and safer. Entering a house with gas stoves feels like stepping back in time.

Re: New York to ban natural gas, including stoves, in new buildings

#728

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Not true, heat pumps are widely used as primary heat sources in environments as cold or colder than NY, like in Montreal and other parts of Canada. As the owner of a 5 year old heat pump in a milder climate in Indiana, I can tell you this: * When it is under 10°F, my heat pump switches to emergency heat... forced air electric and is very expensive to run. * Often the temperature swings are pretty wild... 40-50 degr…

You bought a shitty heat pump and decided you were okay with living in a state that produces electricity using fossil fuels. What's your point again?

I've noticed often the response to criticism is "you should have spent $10k more". And the people who spent the extra who enquire about excessive costs then get met with "why did you over-spec your system?" lol

Re: New York to ban natural gas, including stoves, in new buildings

#729

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I suspect you're conflating resistance cooktops (the kind with coils that heat up) and induction cooktops (which use EM fields to transfer energy directly into the pan). Resistance cooktops are slow and weak, but induction cooktops are just plain better than gas (faster to heat across the entire temperature range, better temperature control) in pretty much every case except when needing a pan that doesn't fit the ind…

Yeah, and if you’re talking about poor people, what electric stove will their apartment have, resistance or induction? And will they have induction safe cookware? Banning gas stoves would be a huge blow to all the immigrants who rely on cooking techniques (like woks) that don’t work well on resistance coils, and require expensive special equipment to work on induction.

Induction these days is almost as cheap as gas, not sure if that makes a difference any more.

I still like looking on gas a lot better.

Re: New York to ban natural gas, including stoves, in new buildings

#730
post #687
post #686

Earlier quoted context omitted.

i like to roast my aubergine for babaganoush on an open flame. try that on an induction cooker and let me know?

I assume you make non-roasted dishes as well? I’d like to say the majority of dishes don’t need a flame - but I’m sure you would provide a list of exceptions.

Why have a heating unit for food at all if we can all survive on gruel at room temperature?

"You don't need it, so you can't have it" is a dangerous argument.

Post reply on HN