Live data from Hacker News

U.S. Rep. Angie Craig drops college requirement for staffers

kare11.com

151–160 of 314 posts

Re: U.S. Rep. Angie Craig drops college requirement for staffers

#151

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

When those standards cost resources to acquire and maintain without providing a return? Yes, absolutely that's harmful for humanity in general

The return is a more educated populace, what's harmful for humanity in general is thinking about everything in monetary terms

Re: U.S. Rep. Angie Craig drops college requirement for staffers

#152

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Hiring people from a sociology/social justice background would just mean the same abuses of power, but different targets. Policing has gone in this direction in the UK, and now you have mothers being arrested in front of their children after “misgendering” someone online: https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/i-stand-with-kate-scotto... > St Albans Magistrates’ Court found her guilty, under the Communications Act (2003…

That sounds more like a problem with the law than with the police.

Policing isn’t independent of the law or legal culture, and police have enormous discretion in how they choose to apply the law.

There’s also the entire issue of “non-criminal bias incidents”:

https://www.pressandjournal.co.uk/fp/opinion/columnists/5238...

Re: U.S. Rep. Angie Craig drops college requirement for staffers

#153

Sort of related, ontario is dropping university requirements for police: https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/ontario-eliminating-edu... I wonder if it's coincidence or the start of a trend back to sanity about job qualifications. Ironically, by becoming almost ubiquitous, university education also becomes irrelevant.

It's Goodhart's law in action.

If having a four year degree becomes just a checkbox, there will be easier and easier ways of getting that checkbox. There will be rent-seeking entities that will facilitate this like degree mills and dubious online programs. It no longer becomes a qualification that the person has gained any skills, but only that they were able to finance paying tens of thousands of dollars to participate in a few discussion threads.

It was only a matter of time for people to realise that requiring degrees for jobs that don't really need them is just cargo-culting.

Re: U.S. Rep. Angie Craig drops college requirement for staffers

#154

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Honestly, tradework like plumbing or electrical might be a surprisingly good qualification for entry-level congressional staff positions. Project management, scheduling, finance, and perhaps most importantly dealing with (sometimes pissed off) customers/constituents and the tradeoffs of what is possible, versus feasible, versus affordable. Realistically a lot of the function of undergraduate degrees (in fields withou…

I think this romanticization of plumbers has really gotten out of hand.

I tend to think that more of the problem here is romanticization of congressional staffers. While there are positions that rely on more background knowledge like policy analysis, a lot of congressional staff members are essentially just customer service representatives and learn most of what they need to know on the job. Anyone who can keep track of a few different things and deal with customers should be a good fit.

Re: U.S. Rep. Angie Craig drops college requirement for staffers

#155

This is really great. I've been talking with friends who have high schoolers, and it's clear that the college preparation and application process is incredibly stressful, time-consuming, and expensive. And that's for the kids who are a reasonably good fit for college, and who have supportive parents. But so much of the market value of a college degree is in the signaling (just showing you were smart enough to get in)…

On the flip side…

I have two high school seniors. We have the resources and support they could need, but they have both opted out of all forms of college at this point. (They wouldn’t even fill out an application when I offered to pay them to apply, and refused to take any HS classes that were not graduation requirements as seniors.) I have tried to make the point that they owe it to their future self to keep their options open, but they just don’t care.

Now their friends are being accepted to college and starting to talk about going away for school…and I’m starting to see the first cracks of regret. I wonder if they’ll have more stress or less in the long run given their choices.

It definitely feels like this generation is skeptical of college, but very few are truly opting out.

Re: U.S. Rep. Angie Craig drops college requirement for staffers

#156

This is really great. I've been talking with friends who have high schoolers, and it's clear that the college preparation and application process is incredibly stressful, time-consuming, and expensive. And that's for the kids who are a reasonably good fit for college, and who have supportive parents. But so much of the market value of a college degree is in the signaling (just showing you were smart enough to get in)…

i completely agree, the stress induced from the process of prepping for college and jumping through other bureaucratic hoops is not worth the cost and the cost is not worth the end result

i do pharmaceutical work, and my employer will only hire people with bachelors degrees but i swear i could teach this to a middle schooler. there's no reason we can't allow people to learn from life rather than learn for bureaucratic requirements.

Re: U.S. Rep. Angie Craig drops college requirement for staffers

#157

Earlier quoted context omitted.

True, but it’s only idealistic because nobody is seriously talking about it. The two options seem to either be defund or militarize. If more people talk about sensible options regularly then they won’t seem like pipe dreams. In any case the point here is that college degrees clearly don’t serve as great police training.

There are people seriously talking about it. E.g. the current President of the United States has been talking about better police training since his campaign, and has issued executive orders touching on it. It's just kind of boring, so it doesn't end up in the news and doesn't go anywhere with the legislature. (edit: I don't want to litigate whether POTUS's preferences for better training would actually improve thing…

In that case, I guess I’m not being idealistic, just reasonable.

Re: U.S. Rep. Angie Craig drops college requirement for staffers

#158
post #135

Sort of related, ontario is dropping university requirements for police: https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/ontario-eliminating-edu... I wonder if it's coincidence or the start of a trend back to sanity about job qualifications. Ironically, by becoming almost ubiquitous, university education also becomes irrelevant.

I don't need police to be highly educated necessarily. I do need police to be psychologically balanced and show calm restraint. Is there a way we can put that in the job requirements and use it as hiring criteria?

I don't need police to have a 4-year degree (or a 2-year degree), but I would like them to be highly educated and trained.

Re: U.S. Rep. Angie Craig drops college requirement for staffers

#159
post #9

I've never heard any justification for having "college education" as a job requirement. Or at least no justification that didn't amount to "keep out people who aren't like us", or "pretend to be competent", or "posture as exclusive".

The reason you haven't heard it is because nobody wants to say it out loud and get the resulting blowback: it's because college attendance is a proxy for IQ, which is far and away the strongest correlating factor with job performance. Since the Supreme Court ruled that employers can't use IQ tests in hiring decisions, they use the presence of a college degree instead.

Re: U.S. Rep. Angie Craig drops college requirement for staffers

#160

This is really great. I've been talking with friends who have high schoolers, and it's clear that the college preparation and application process is incredibly stressful, time-consuming, and expensive. And that's for the kids who are a reasonably good fit for college, and who have supportive parents. But so much of the market value of a college degree is in the signaling (just showing you were smart enough to get in)…

On the flip side… I have two high school seniors. We have the resources and support they could need, but they have both opted out of all forms of college at this point. (They wouldn’t even fill out an application when I offered to pay them to apply, and refused to take any HS classes that were not graduation requirements as seniors.) I have tried to make the point that they owe it to their future self to keep their o…

What do your kids plan to do after HS? If they regret the decision after seeing their friends go off to college, couldn't they apply next year and say they took a gap year to do all the things they missed out on during COVID, or some such thing?
Post reply on HN