Live data from Hacker News

DeepFloyd IF: open-source text-to-image model

github.com

131–140 of 237 posts

Re: DeepFloyd IF: open-source text-to-image model

#131

Any web based front ends yet? I put together a system that runs a variety of web based open source AI image generation and editing tools on Vultr GPU instances. It spins up instances on demand, mounts an NFS filesystem with local caching and a COW layer, spawns the services, proxies the requests, and then spins down idle instances when I'm done. Would love to add this, suppose I could whip something up if none exists…

What's your app / service called?!

Re: DeepFloyd IF: open-source text-to-image model

#132
post #115
post #55

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I am a lawyer, and as flimsy and wishy-washy as the term "open-source" already is, I can't even fathom what is meant by "open source" here? Are people suggesting that "look at the code but don't touch" actually fits what some people think of as open source?

NOT a lawyer here, basially they meant, here the thing, please don't sue me if you messed up.

That's weird, because we do have extremely standard language to take care of that. That's just "warranty disclaimers"

Re: DeepFloyd IF: open-source text-to-image model

#133

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There's a certain irony in tweeting ad hominem attacks then claiming people are being defensive...

Yeah perhaps I was not good at judging tone. To me it's a matter of fact thing that MJ isn't good at this. They'd admit it, it's not a big deal and I'm a fan. It's not ad hominem at all... mj isn't as good at certain types of composition as others. I don't get why people are pretending that isn't the case. I want everyone to have great models and IF is part of that progress. Perhaps calling it "word soup" was offensi…

"There's a funny hn thread where people aren't good at arguing or experimentation" is an insult.

Re: DeepFloyd IF: open-source text-to-image model

#135

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Then by definition it isn't open source, violating points 3, 4, and 6 of the open source definition. https://opensource.org/osd/

Yep. It's getting really exhausting seeing projects falsely advertising themselves as "open source". Either be FOSS or don't be; don't pretend to be while using some nonsense like the BSL or whatever adhocery is in play here.

I bet it's a new benchmark for the labs to get funding

Re: DeepFloyd IF: open-source text-to-image model

#136

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In what way does the man on the right not look like he could be from the absolutely enormous continent known as Asia?

Thing is, it's possible to just run experiments against your claim that "actually the bot was doing a good job" https://twitter.com/eb_french/status/1651584746089218049 it wasn't. Again, I don't know why everyone is so defensive. I love MJ. There's nothing wrong with admitting that other models might do certain things better. We all can use any model we want.

I didn't claim the bot was doing a good job. Who was this reply supposed to be aimed at?

Re: DeepFloyd IF: open-source text-to-image model

#137
post #128

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm human. I interpreted Asian as from a non-specific part of Asia. I realise though that "Asian" has a very specific meaning in the US, but it's only the US that does this. For the rest of the world Asian means someone from Asia.

That's kind of what I meant... If a prompt specifies one "Indian", and one "Asian", that implies that the writer of the prompt doesn't think of Indian as Asian so probably from the US background.

There's more than two countries in Asia. Could be one Indian and one Sri Lankan, which is what the old dude looks like to me.
Post reply on HN