Have we forgiven them now?
Every web search result in Brave Search is now served by our own index
411–420 of 494 posts
Re: Every web search result in Brave Search is now served by our own index
#412Earlier quoted context omitted.
Higher compared to what? There are plenty of smaller hostels/hotels which don't even bother to have their own website (only some FB page, and Booking.com listing)
Booking.com has a higher chance for errors compared to hotels' direct bookings since its information is secondhand and unreliable. For the hotels with direct booking avenues, why use booking.com?
Re: Every web search result in Brave Search is now served by our own index
#413Earlier quoted context omitted.
The Mozilla CEO is to blame for the chaos they caused around Firefox, and them losing market share to Chrome for the past 14 years. Mozilla is so dysfunctional that the CEO is rewarded a massive bonus for running the company to the ground and laying off their employees. They are not interested in competing against Chrome; instead they are chronically dependent on Google's money and on life support, making over 80% of…
> I hope Brave makes Firefox (and Mozilla) even more irrelevant. I get that you hate Mozilla, but from the perspective of an end user of browsers, this is a deeply irrational position. Less competition in the browser space is uniformly bad for end users, as we've seen very clearly in the past.
As to Mozilla, their combination of incompetence, user-hostility, and complete dependence on Google renders them controlled opposition at best. They are not a serious player in the browser space, continuing to treat them like one is directing limited resources and mind share into a failing enterprise.
Re: Every web search result in Brave Search is now served by our own index
#414Earlier quoted context omitted.
I notice it every time when the benefit of booking 3rd party is questioned.
Having to walk a guest when the hotel cannot meet the terms of the reservation is part of the contract between the big hotel brands and franchisors. If the hotel operators do not fulfill the walk policy, then you should contact the 800 number for Marriott/Hilton/IHG/Choice/Wyndham/etc and they will mail you a check for your expenses and bill the hotel owner.
Re: Every web search result in Brave Search is now served by our own index
#415Earlier quoted context omitted.
Firefox usage is abysmal on Desktop (from the Cloudflare usage stats which doesn't depend on JavaScript being enabled) and practically inexistent on mobile. My tech friends gave up, and normal users just use the defaults: Edge (which is good enough for them), Safari or whatever browser default browser comes with their smartphone. Mozilla needs to figure out how to attract new users, and focus.
A lot of us are running with modified UA strings to combat fingerprinting.
Having stopped Firefox users from browsing the net with infinite verification loops, Cloudflare finds their unbiased estimation of internet browser usage shows Firefox is in decline.
Re: Every web search result in Brave Search is now served by our own index
#416Earlier quoted context omitted.
I notice it every time when the benefit of booking 3rd party is questioned.
Having to walk a guest when the hotel cannot meet the terms of the reservation is part of the contract between the big hotel brands and franchisors. If the hotel operators do not fulfill the walk policy, then you should contact the 800 number for Marriott/Hilton/IHG/Choice/Wyndham/etc and they will mail you a check for your expenses and bill the hotel owner.
Most of the larger chains even have benefits if you go direct though.
Re: Every web search result in Brave Search is now served by our own index
#417Earlier quoted context omitted.
If a hotel double booked you and you showed up, the hotel would walk you to a nearby similar hotel all paid for by the hotel. The “walk” process is a standard industry practice.
This whole reply thread looks astroturfed.
If you think I'm an astroturfer look at my comment history, I've never mentioned hotels before.
Re: Every web search result in Brave Search is now served by our own index
#418Earlier quoted context omitted.
Booking.com requires the cheapest price, unless you are talking about the price from the hotel’s rewards program, which they will push very hard. It’s a contract loophole that works out for everyone except the non-savvy (or privacy-conscious) consumer.
> except the non-savvy (or privacy-conscious) consumer. Every single hotel I have been to already requires your ID and records your information at check in. In fact, it is required by pretty much all city laws in the US. I also would not want to stay in a hotel that does not require it.
Re: Every web search result in Brave Search is now served by our own index
#419Earlier quoted context omitted.
And yes downvote me but maybe think about whether spending more money going to first-party sites is actually serving you?
While I didn't downvote you, I'm one of those "idiots" who tends to book directly on hotel web sites because I'm a member of several free-to-join hotel loyalty programs. The aggregators generally do not beat prices available for members (which, again, I can be for free). It's not uncommon for me to find specials, room types, or even availability, period, available on the direct sites that the aggregators don't have.…
The annoying thing is that should so obviously be the case! Booking direct should always be cheaper and better, right? But I've found that even if booking.com is cheaper the hotel refuses to match the price when booking directly. And they never told me about any loyalty scheme :/
Re: Every web search result in Brave Search is now served by our own index
#420Earlier quoted context omitted.
I have the early adopter professional plan, but I must admit that while I consider myself very much a power user I have never been close to even 700 searches a month.
Can you walk me through what a typical search day is like for you? To me, the 700 soft limit seems absurd so I'm curious to hear how you interact with the product. I average 50-100 searches per work day and 10-20 searcher per off day (totalling 1-2.5k per month). But I don't feel I'm using search in a particularly strange way. For example, if I need to know how the new WidgetBean in SpringBoot works I'll usually end…