Live data from Hacker News

Every web search result in Brave Search is now served by our own index

brave.com

211–220 of 494 posts

Re: Every web search result in Brave Search is now served by our own index

#211
post #15
post #8

How is it that Brave managed to build an indexer and remove dependence on Bing in less than two years but DuckDuckGo hasn't been able to do it in a decade.

The search index is relatively easy, the ad marketplace is hard. DDG is likely hooked on tens or hundreds of millions of dollars in Bing revenue which is a tough habit to kick.

That shouldn’t stop DDG from using their own index instead of the Bing search API for organic search results though right?

Re: Every web search result in Brave Search is now served by our own index

#212
post #209

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>don't magically get a better rate when prices are high. That's when you spend your points. Though it depends severely on the brand. Marriott and Hilton are no longer great. But Wyndham and Hyatt are pretty amazing. Starwood, used to be good until Marriott bought them out.

Mariott is pretty good. The single time I stayed in a Hilton was so nasty I’ll never do it again.

Hotel brands franchise the properties and hotel owners and management vary and change so much the best option, I have found, is to check flyertalk or other forums for recent reviews.

Re: Every web search result in Brave Search is now served by our own index

#214
post #202

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I have two email relays from DDG and have never installed their extension nor even knew they had an extension when I got their relays. (I know now but at the time I didn't) If you download the app on your phone, you can get a relay and then immidiately uninstall the app.

Yes, but you had to install an app. Why? They already have your email. They're forwarding email to you as part of the service. And you probably had to verify your email with them when you started using it. So why should you be required to also install either an app or a browser extension? Doesn't the very act of installing something on your devices increase their technical ability to collect information about you and…

Reading your comments made me realize how a service like DDG could never succeed. The only people who care about its advantages are the same users they lose for anything that remotely helps the company grow.

Apple is a regular company and gets points for adding privacy features. DDG? “Nah, F that, they suggested I run code on my device for a brand-new unrelated service. Reprehensible.”

Re: Every web search result in Brave Search is now served by our own index

#215
post #5

Using Brave Search feels like the Google Search from mid 2000s. Anyone tired of Google should give it a try.

i tried, but I was immediately put off by the inability to search for an exact string. To me, that makes a search engine useless. Am i missing something? I tried using quotes etc, but the results always force up approximate matches.

Re: Every web search result in Brave Search is now served by our own index

#216

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes. If you browse YouTube on mobile via the Brave browser it blocks all YouTube ads. I haven't used the YouTube app in a year...

Unrelated, but the same result is achievable by using Safari and 1Blocker for the people who don’t feel like installing another browser but are tempted by the mobile, ads free YouTube experience on iOS

That’s what I do. I’d like to make the switch to Brave but iCloud passwords is a must have feature for me so I’m stuck with Safari on iOS and Mac.

Re: Every web search result in Brave Search is now served by our own index

#217
post #95

Earlier quoted context omitted.

search.marginalia.nu consisted of 1 Swedish engineer and 1 server last I heard and still managed to outclass DDG in a number of query types relevant to me. In fact, back when I used DDG I think I fell back to marginalia more often than I fell back to Google, partly because of my dislike for Google and partly because Google doesn't respect my queries - which of course is a contributing reason for my dislike for them.…

> search.marginalia.nu consisted of 1 Swedish engineer and 1 server last I heard and still managed to outclass DDG in a number of query types relevant to me. Still just 1 dinky lil' consumer hardware server in my living room. I think what is limiting the project the most is the hardware. Like I can definitely squeeze more out of it, but I could probably do 100 times more if I had any sort of operational budget. But a…

Does this mean you have more engineers working on it now? That was my reading of the grandparent comment's implications.

BTW, thank you very much for offering this service, even though I don't use it often.

Re: Every web search result in Brave Search is now served by our own index

#218
post #179

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That isn't the only definition. For example Cambridge's definition of censorship ( https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/censo... ) "the action of preventing part or the whole of a book, movie, work of art, document, or other kind of communication from being seen or made available to the public, because it is considered to be offensive or harmful, or because it contains information that someone wishe…

Implicit in that the action is about preventing someone else from making that content public.

[deleted]

Re: Every web search result in Brave Search is now served by our own index

#219
post #139

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Well the guy who started Brave used to head up Firefox before the employees revolted and demanded he be fired over politics.

"politics" is one way to describe him donating a large sum of money to a bigoted anti-gay cause and losing the trust of his employees.

A cause on which the majority of Californian voters agreed with him at the time.

Re: Every web search result in Brave Search is now served by our own index

#220
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I use both. Brave is better for the "chromium only" wonky websites/webapps. But the whole altruistic privacy thing is kind of undercut, at least optics-wise, by all the crypto/gamification upsell present by default. Not good when your supposedly privacy-focused browser requires extensive fiddling in the settings to shut everything off on initial install a-la Windows 11...

It's a little odd to be concerned about privacy focus on a post-Windows 10 os.

They said Brave behaves like W11...
Post reply on HN