It is able to put people on the left/right and put the correct t-shirts and facial expressions on each one. This is compared to mj which just mixes together a soup of every word you use and plops it out into the image. Huge MJ fan of course, it's amazing, but having compositional power is another step up.
DeepFloyd IF: open-source text-to-image model
61–70 of 237 posts
Re: DeepFloyd IF: open-source text-to-image model
#6235% to full release by end of month, although it may not have adjusted.
Re: DeepFloyd IF: open-source text-to-image model
#63Has anyone tried the Scott Alexander AI bet prompts? 1. A stained glass picture of a woman in a library with a raven on her shoulder with a key in its mouth 2. An oil painting of a man in a factory looking at a cat wearing a top hat 3. A digital art picture of a child riding a llama with a bell on its tail through a desert 4. A 3D render of an astronaut in space holding a fox wearing lipstick 5. Pixel art of a farmer…
Re: DeepFloyd IF: open-source text-to-image model
#64Has anyone tried the Scott Alexander AI bet prompts? 1. A stained glass picture of a woman in a library with a raven on her shoulder with a key in its mouth 2. An oil painting of a man in a factory looking at a cat wearing a top hat 3. A digital art picture of a child riding a llama with a bell on its tail through a desert 4. A 3D render of an astronaut in space holding a fox wearing lipstick 5. Pixel art of a farmer…
Yes, I tried them here on an earlier version of IF: https://twitter.com/eb_french/status/1618354180577714176
Re: DeepFloyd IF: open-source text-to-image model
#65Example of how much better it can do compared to midjourney, on a complex prompt: https://twitter.com/eb_french/status/1623823175170805760 It is able to put people on the left/right and put the correct t-shirts and facial expressions on each one. This is compared to mj which just mixes together a soup of every word you use and plops it out into the image. Huge MJ fan of course, it's amazing, but having compositional…
Re: DeepFloyd IF: open-source text-to-image model
#6616GB VRAM minimum is a bit steep. Sadly excludes my 3080 which is annoying because I'd like something better than Stable Diffusion locally.
The architecture here looks different, but the code is licensed in a way which still makes downstream optimization and redistribution possible, so maybe there will be something there.
Re: DeepFloyd IF: open-source text-to-image model
#67Example of how much better it can do compared to midjourney, on a complex prompt: https://twitter.com/eb_french/status/1623823175170805760 It is able to put people on the left/right and put the correct t-shirts and facial expressions on each one. This is compared to mj which just mixes together a soup of every word you use and plops it out into the image. Huge MJ fan of course, it's amazing, but having compositional…
Re: DeepFloyd IF: open-source text-to-image model
#68Example of how much better it can do compared to midjourney, on a complex prompt: https://twitter.com/eb_french/status/1623823175170805760 It is able to put people on the left/right and put the correct t-shirts and facial expressions on each one. This is compared to mj which just mixes together a soup of every word you use and plops it out into the image. Huge MJ fan of course, it's amazing, but having compositional…
That's not how any of this works what do you even mean by compositional power? Every model speaks a different "language" comparing prompts like this has no merit and shows only that the person who makes the claim lacks understanding of the subject matter.
i.e. if you say "a red cube on a green sphere" in DeepFloyd, you will get it. If you say that in MJ, you won't. That means you have more power to compose the image you want with this tool.
Re: DeepFloyd IF: open-source text-to-image model
#69Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's not how any of this works what do you even mean by compositional power? Every model speaks a different "language" comparing prompts like this has no merit and shows only that the person who makes the claim lacks understanding of the subject matter.
Compositional power might mean "the image more resembles the composition you want and describe" i.e. if you say "a red cube on a green sphere" in DeepFloyd, you will get it. If you say that in MJ, you won't. That means you have more power to compose the image you want with this tool.
Re: DeepFloyd IF: open-source text-to-image model
#70Example of how much better it can do compared to midjourney, on a complex prompt: https://twitter.com/eb_french/status/1623823175170805760 It is able to put people on the left/right and put the correct t-shirts and facial expressions on each one. This is compared to mj which just mixes together a soup of every word you use and plops it out into the image. Huge MJ fan of course, it's amazing, but having compositional…
So it seems like Midjourney looks better and has more realistic faces but this one is better at following the prompt and generating what you actually want