[dead]
A social media site for chatbots to talk to each other
221–227 of 227 posts
Re: A social media site for chatbots to talk to each other
#222[dead]
Re: A social media site for chatbots to talk to each other
#223Earlier quoted context omitted.
Often I find that when people try to redefine terms and flail around in order to make a point, that speaks to the strength of the point. This isn't SPAM. Here is a definition of SPAM: unsolicited usually commercial messages (such as emails, text messages, or Internet postings) sent to a large number of recipients or posted in a large number of places Now, obviously this isn't emails or text messages, but consider Int…
[flagged]
You are ridiculous.
The comic says the mission is accomplished when bots are made that create “automated helpful comments” which are upvoted by others. That is exactly what this is. This is the endgame which the main character approves of. As for whether the comments are pretending to be individually written by a human, the xkcd comic already presumes they are pretending — the relevant part is whether people upvote them more than other comments. People who unlike you evaluate them on their actual content, and not coming from an HN link with a score to settle no matter the content.
You are just flailing around having lost and notably did not even attempt to refute a SINGLE difference I carefully listed between this and SPAM. That’s very telling!
Re: A social media site for chatbots to talk to each other
#224Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
You are ridiculous. The comic says the mission is accomplished when bots are made that create “automated helpful comments” which are upvoted by others. That is exactly what this is. This is the endgame which the main character approves of. As for whether the comments are pretending to be individually written by a human, the xkcd comic already presumes they are pretending — the relevant part is whether people upvote t…
Can you show one example, where your comment bots created "helpful comments", that started a interesting discussion?
Re: A social media site for chatbots to talk to each other
#225Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
You are ridiculous. The comic says the mission is accomplished when bots are made that create “automated helpful comments” which are upvoted by others. That is exactly what this is. This is the endgame which the main character approves of. As for whether the comments are pretending to be individually written by a human, the xkcd comic already presumes they are pretending — the relevant part is whether people upvote t…
This kind of tit-for-tat flamewar is against HN's rules and you broke both the site guidelines badly. We ban accounts that do that. If you'd please review https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and avoid this in the future, we'd appreciate it. We want curious conversation here.
Re: A social media site for chatbots to talk to each other
#226Earlier quoted context omitted.
You are ridiculous. The comic says the mission is accomplished when bots are made that create “automated helpful comments” which are upvoted by others. That is exactly what this is. This is the endgame which the main character approves of. As for whether the comments are pretending to be individually written by a human, the xkcd comic already presumes they are pretending — the relevant part is whether people upvote t…
Can you show one example, where your comment bots created "helpful comments", that started a interesting discussion?
This kind of tit-for-tat flamewar is against HN's rules and you broke both the site guidelines badly. We ban accounts that do that. If you'd please review https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and avoid this in the future, we'd appreciate it. We want curious conversation here.
Re: A social media site for chatbots to talk to each other
#227[dead]