Live data from Hacker News

Bilingualism affords no general cognitive advantages: Study

journals.sagepub.com

361–370 of 435 posts

Re: Bilingualism affords no general cognitive advantages: Study

#361
post #339

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's in the paper. You present a battery of tasks, and see how well you do. In this case, twelve cognitive tests were included: Double Trouble Spatial Planning Odd One Out Grammatical Reasoning Feature Match Polygons Digit Span Rotations Token Search Paired Associates Spatial Span Monkey Ladder

> It's in the paper. Most of us don't have access to the paper, although our tax dollars surely paid for it.

Most of us use scihub to retrieve papers.

Re: Bilingualism affords no general cognitive advantages: Study

#362
post #228

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Funny how the Chinese have to use that 26-letter alphabet too, because you can't put thousands of characters on a keyboard.

Smartphones have changed this. You can write characters directly on a touchscreen. It's not as popular of an input method as pinyin, but it's not uncommon either. There's also Bopomofo, as an alternative to pinyin input.[0] 0. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bopomofo

Writing characters on a touchscreen seems horrible.

Re: Bilingualism affords no general cognitive advantages: Study

#363
post #94

This study seems to focus on acquired languages and ignores mulitple languages learned in childhood. As someone who grew up speaking three languages (German, Hebrew and English) I feel as if this has expanded my ability to conceptualize and form abstractions because I know "what it is like" to think natively in languages with different vocabularies and syntactic structures. That comes naturally with no effort when yo…

> I feel as if this has expanded my ability

What benchmark could you possibly have for this? You have no clue what monolingual you would have been like.

Re: Bilingualism affords no general cognitive advantages: Study

#364
post #267

Being able to think in multiple languages frees the mind from thinking in language altogether. This is easy to deduce with reasoning and I can confirm it (to myself) from experience. What psychological "science" has to say about it makes me question their study than anything. It is important to remember however that not all bilinguals are equal. The languages have to be different enough. English, German and Swedish (…

Aside from that, don't underestimate the amount of thinking we do without language. What do we call that - raw braincode? So in that sense, we're all bilingual, even those only speaking English. I.e. you can think "I'm going down to the post office to post a letter with a stamp on it" without language.

True. But for single-language speakers (and even some bilinguals who haven't thought about this), it is easier to conflate the raw thinking and the language they associate with it (which we know happens after the fact)... because they only have one language to work with. A bilingual on the other hand will understand the concept instantly if they were to think about something as themselves in one language and the same thing as themselves in another language... and they don't have to rely on poorly designed studies to know these things.

Also, depending on how integrated the different language personalities are (probably depends on whether they learnt the language as a child or as an adult), they should also easily be able to see that they are not one personality but at least two personalities embodied in one being (which can then be taken further into understanding that what we think of our "self" is made up of many different personalities based on different contexts... which is all acquired from upbringing).

Re: Bilingualism affords no general cognitive advantages: Study

#365
A counterfactual is that higher IQ correlates with reading ability and language use. Those people are far more likely to know more than one language (because it's easier) and gain access to the deeper, more expansive pool of opportunities that comes with bilingualism.

Re: Bilingualism affords no general cognitive advantages: Study

#366
post #228
post #179

I see at least one subtle advantage in being multi-lingual: distinguishing concepts more clearly. I see monolingual English speakers who confuse to/too/two, there/their/they're, etc. It's hard to blame them because these word triplets are pronounced the same, so why bother distinguishing them in writing. Knowing how these words map to different languages reinforces their distinctions. There/their/they're in Chinese a…

Funny how the Chinese have to use that 26-letter alphabet too, because you can't put thousands of characters on a keyboard.

Chinese doesn't have to use A-to-Z with Pinyin. There are input methods like Cangjie, Wubi, Bopomofo, 1-to-9 stroking on number pads, and handwriting. But yes, pinyin A-to-Z is the most pragmatic for many reasons.

Re: Bilingualism affords no general cognitive advantages: Study

#367
I'm from a Hispanic family which is by and large bilingual and uses quite a lot of Spanglish at family events. However, I was raised monolingual, with English. My parents say they sometimes regret not teaching me Spanish. But, on they other hand, they recognize that my English rhetorical skills are significantly better than they might otherwise have been. Given that English is a language with a wide vocabulary and quite expressive specificity, this confers all sorts of advantages to me, especially in technical applications.

I am most definitely a programming polyglot, however, and that was of my own doing. Learning many programming languages has most definitely had a profound effect on how I think about problems and break down sub-problems. I don't think it's made me smarter or more intelligent generally, but it has opened doors to solutions I would not have been able to consider otherwise, which is probably a good analogy for what this study is suggesting.

I have definitely settled in a nice generally-optimal zone of functional-procedural: Isolate state to referentially transparent procedures, and mutate all the state you want within those procedures, but the overall program structure should be a functional pyramid of value-returning calls.

Re: Bilingualism affords no general cognitive advantages: Study

#368
post #320

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I suspect they meant Chomsky.

I thought so as well, but a quick web search suggests that Noam Chomsky speaks English and Hebrew. (It's a shame that Noam Chomsky is the most famous linguist, because he's so far from the best or most relevant one.) See also eg https://www.reddit.com/r/chomsky/comments/8ght5y/what_langua...

The only other candidate then would be Pinker, but I'm not sure if he's monolingual either.

Re: Bilingualism affords no general cognitive advantages: Study

#369
post #309

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> It's long been stated in popular culture that learning a language increases cognitive ability: improves memory, reasoning, and helps reduce onset of senility etc. This study suggests it isn't. The study is about "bilingualism", not about "learning". Bilingualism is a passive property, e.g. children born to parents speaking different languages will acquire those languages, but in adulthood no longer be in the proces…

My main "issue" with the paper (which I really like just to be clear) is that I can't completely figure out how they grouped someone as bilingual (maybe that's on me but it doesn't seem very clear in the methods section). It seems they used self identification by the participants (18+ old). If that's the case someone that learned the language in school would be considered bilingual. For example, if the questionaire a…

It's impressive that your comments reads like a well-educated native speaker of English, except for "Englisch".

Anyway, your English is far, far better than "learned it in school". Those books and TV(And fluent English users in school?) were an effective immersion. It's quite different from the common USA style of learning a non-English language: "5 years of classes but no immersit in culture"

Re: Bilingualism affords no general cognitive advantages: Study

#370

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> HN is a good example. I see what (mostly) American people think, I like HN as much as the next critter but HN is an extremely small and biased sample of the US. The demographic is skewed towards young and liberal (even socialist at times) when the actual country is more like 50/50 liberal/conservative, to oversimplify a bit. On HN, you are also seeing comments from people who have both strong opinions and the free…

No worries. I am very aware that HN is heavily biased (actually, most places where discussion happens are biased). Also of course HN is not my only exposure to american culture (would be kinda absurd if it was though lol). But your comment actually illustrates very well what I mean. I know it's normal for americans to call HN "socialist" and in my culture almost nobody would use that word to describe HN. Or another e…

Is an HN/forum/human thing to ignore people with similar politics as "normal" background, and overestimate the prevalence of people with different politics.

You get a wide range of responses if you search for comments of HN posters trying to estimate the politics of HN posters.

Post reply on HN