This person severely misread the book. I could give quite a few examples from the writing. For instance, the child labor issue he brings up is ridiculous - "Rich Dad" obviously didn't benefit from this labor in any financial way. The premise of the book is solid; invest in assets that make money for you without you having to be there. He specifically says in the book a few times that he doesn't necessarily advocate r…
Rich Dad Poor Dad... Worst Personal Finance Book of All Time?
11–20 of 138 posts
Re: Rich Dad Poor Dad... Worst Personal Finance Book of All Time?
#12http://www.johntreed.com/Kiyosaki.html Is probably one of the better resources regarding Robert Kiyosaki.
While it doesn't say anything about his arguments, it should be noted that John T. Reed is far from unbiased, he's Kiyosaki's direct competitor.
Re: Rich Dad Poor Dad... Worst Personal Finance Book of All Time?
#13You can't underestimate the gullibility of the masses when a book starts getting some good initial publicity - the wave becomes its own animal with everyone repeating all of the good things previously said of the book, no matter how right or wrong. Sad to say, I bought and read the book a few years under the same guidance.
Product being up-sold like a time share? Superlative claims like a male enhancement product? Partnering with Donald Trump's hair? Check, check and check.
Re: Rich Dad Poor Dad... Worst Personal Finance Book of All Time?
#14Don't really get the arguments. Don't spend more then you earn. So why is it bad to destroy your credit rating? Advise is not using credit. Maybe he wrote the book for Europeans? We don't have a credit rating. Just if you fuck up you get blacklisted and don't receive any credit. But we don't have a personal bankruptcy system either ;) Actually it's not that bad to pay yourself first and the government later. You have…
The best take away was his definition of wealth.... when your income from your assetts pay for your lifestyle.....simple as that. thats wealthy.
Re: Rich Dad Poor Dad... Worst Personal Finance Book of All Time?
#15This person severely misread the book. I could give quite a few examples from the writing. For instance, the child labor issue he brings up is ridiculous - "Rich Dad" obviously didn't benefit from this labor in any financial way. The premise of the book is solid; invest in assets that make money for you without you having to be there. He specifically says in the book a few times that he doesn't necessarily advocate r…
The rest of the book succeeds only in massacring the concepts. Insider trading? Illegal. Real-estate lowballing? The only guarantee is a bad reputation.
It wasn't hard to find lucrative investments in the late 90s. I can't help but wonder what happened to his real estate empire when the bubble burst, if it even existed.
There are many books that do justice to explaining those seven items you've mentioned. Rich Dad is definitely not one of them.
Re: Rich Dad Poor Dad... Worst Personal Finance Book of All Time?
#16This person severely misread the book. I could give quite a few examples from the writing. For instance, the child labor issue he brings up is ridiculous - "Rich Dad" obviously didn't benefit from this labor in any financial way. The premise of the book is solid; invest in assets that make money for you without you having to be there. He specifically says in the book a few times that he doesn't necessarily advocate r…
If the only valid point he has is that passive investments are a good thing, it's not a great personal finance book. You could learn a similar amount by looking up "investment" in a good dictionary.
If you read HN then you already understand the premise of the book. But for society writ large "Rich Dad, Poor Dad" was a wakeup call to reexamine core values and life choices.
Re: Rich Dad Poor Dad... Worst Personal Finance Book of All Time?
#17It seems to me that if you have to buy infomercial time to sell advice, it isnt very good advice, or it isnt going to work. The Rich Dad, Poor Dad books seem to me like a Don Lapre pitch wrapped in a slightly nicer presentation.
Re: Rich Dad Poor Dad... Worst Personal Finance Book of All Time?
#18This person severely misread the book. I could give quite a few examples from the writing. For instance, the child labor issue he brings up is ridiculous - "Rich Dad" obviously didn't benefit from this labor in any financial way. The premise of the book is solid; invest in assets that make money for you without you having to be there. He specifically says in the book a few times that he doesn't necessarily advocate r…
Sounds like a recipe to hand your money over to scamsters. Esp as it was proven out by "Income generating real estate" in the past decade.
Re: Rich Dad Poor Dad... Worst Personal Finance Book of All Time?
#19Don't really get the arguments. Don't spend more then you earn. So why is it bad to destroy your credit rating? Advise is not using credit. Maybe he wrote the book for Europeans? We don't have a credit rating. Just if you fuck up you get blacklisted and don't receive any credit. But we don't have a personal bankruptcy system either ;) Actually it's not that bad to pay yourself first and the government later. You have…
Yes we do, at least some of us (I don't know about each and every Member State). It's not accessible to most people, since it's locked away behind credit rating bureau's models, but rest assured that there are many places that track e.g. how often you've not paid you phone bill on time.
I much prefer the US approach, at least it's out in the open that it exists, and you have a legal right to access your data.
Re: Rich Dad Poor Dad... Worst Personal Finance Book of All Time?
#20The best way to make money? Sell advice/a book on how to make money. It seems to me that some of these investment opportunities are limited(real estate bargains, etc) so why would you tell the world to leverage them and remove competitive advantage? It seems to me that if you have to buy infomercial time to sell advice, it isnt very good advice, or it isnt going to work. The Rich Dad, Poor Dad books seem to me like a…
Kiyosaki added a note about fictionalizing, which caused a stir.