Earlier quoted context omitted.
"Unbiased" almost always means "has biases that are similar to mine". I can't think of very many exceptions to that, frankly.
That's obviously untrue after more than three seconds of critical thought
SafeGPT: New tool to detect LLMs' hallucinations, biases and privacy issues
81–85 of 85 posts
Re: SafeGPT: New tool to detect LLMs' hallucinations, biases and privacy issues
#82Earlier quoted context omitted.
There's a million categories of problem you could ask an LLM to try to solve. You'd need a million solvers…
This seems like a pretty good thing. The model’s ability to detect _which_ solver to use is the killer feature.
GPT is quite useful, but not because it solves the problem of "I don't know where the question I have is answerable by a calculator"
Re: SafeGPT: New tool to detect LLMs' hallucinations, biases and privacy issues
#83Looks a bit like snakeoil to me. A lot of companies now spinning up simple demos with opaque backends, making huge claims they’ve solved X hard problem for/with AI, then saying “trust us” and “join our waitlist” without hard details or facts to show for it. If you could detect hallucinations/biases etc that easily, don’t you think OpenAI would’ve worked on something like this?
Re: SafeGPT: New tool to detect LLMs' hallucinations, biases and privacy issues
#84Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's impossible to answer this without getting political. Instead, let's just say every previous generation has been critically wrong about some things. Statistically, we're unlikely to be the outlier.
dang's put me on notice, so I'm walking on eggshells here. But truth isn't political. As long as we think it is, we will continue to follow the descent into madness. Truth is just that: truth. The only reason we think truth is political, is because our chosen leaders so heavily depend on lies that the truth would destroy their reign.
Re: SafeGPT: New tool to detect LLMs' hallucinations, biases and privacy issues
#85Looks a bit like snakeoil to me. A lot of companies now spinning up simple demos with opaque backends, making huge claims they’ve solved X hard problem for/with AI, then saying “trust us” and “join our waitlist” without hard details or facts to show for it. If you could detect hallucinations/biases etc that easily, don’t you think OpenAI would’ve worked on something like this?
AI is the new crypto (though with more substance). Attracts many of the same self obsessed snake oil selling characters though.