Live data from Hacker News

Introducing Chrome for Android

googleblog.blogspot.com

51–60 of 240 posts

Re: Introducing Chrome for Android

#51

Firefox for android unfortunately started out real slow...might be a good move for Google. Time to go to xda-developers and see if it'll be on your phone.

Firefox moved to native UI on Android, which made it faster. The minus is obviously need for add-on developers to work with native UI too.

Re: Introducing Chrome for Android

#53

With Android 4.0 at 1% market share, it'll be a long time before most people can even try this. http://developer.android.com/resources/dashboard/platform-ve...

Yeah, while I'm generally excited about this, I won't be able to use it anytime soon, unfortunately.

Same here, I bought into the Nexus One hype, great phone but without ICS we are left high and dry with an expensive paperweight with regards to something like Chrome on ICS.

Re: Introducing Chrome for Android

#54
post #44

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah, while I'm generally excited about this, I won't be able to use it anytime soon, unfortunately.

Root and install a 4.0 rom!

Have any good ROM suggestions? I'm looking for one somebody with first hand use of it can sell me on.

Re: Introducing Chrome for Android

#57
post #11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Which Samsung Android device has a locked bootloader?

Most of the non-Nexus phones technically have a locked bootloader, so that people can only run firmware signed by the carrier. In practice, there are ways of jailbreaking the vast majority of locked phones, but there are some people who don't want to void their warranty or don't want to use community ROMs.

AFAIK (and some google searching seems to confirm) the Galaxy SII does not have a locked bootloader. I believe that the original Galaxy S was also unlocked.

So which Samsung Android devices have locked bootloaders?

Motorola and HTC tend to lock their bootloaders more often (though this situation is improving).

Re: Introducing Chrome for Android

#58
post #50

Will this replace the browser that ships with Android in ICS, or will the user have to download Chrome?

If I read what MG Siegler wrote correctly, it will eventually replace "Browser" on Google Android builds. People like Amazon who aren't paying Google for Android won't get it.

Re: Introducing Chrome for Android

#59

Chrome for iOS please.

Apple doesn't allow applications to provide their own runtimes: “3.3.2 An Application may not download or install executable code. Interpreted code may only be used in an Application if all scripts, code and interpreters are packaged in the Application and not downloaded. The only exception to the foregoing is scripts and code downloaded and run by Apple’s built-in WebKit framework.”

That's not very precise. Legally, Apple doesn't allow to use iOS SDK, i.e. to build such applications. If you manage somehow to build it any other way (not using Apple's SDK), this restriction has no meaning, and while Apple could reject such kind of software from their app store, you could deploy it to alternatives, like Cydia, and still be legal, since you didn't violate any licenses.

I.e. for browsers makers the concern is not that they'll be rejected from the app store, but that they can't even legally build them with the Apple's SDK.

Post reply on HN