My Emacs eye candy
21–30 of 89 posts
Re: My Emacs eye candy
#22I want to switch to one of those Emacs candy looking setup, but it always ends up being a lot less fun once you have it installed and nothing works as you expects, the whole thing looks like grand father software and the UX is beyond bad. Sure, if you put up with the pain of setting it all up, eventually, you have something that works and that only you can use.
Re: My Emacs eye candy
#23I want to switch to one of those Emacs candy looking setup, but it always ends up being a lot less fun once you have it installed and nothing works as you expects, the whole thing looks like grand father software and the UX is beyond bad. Sure, if you put up with the pain of setting it all up, eventually, you have something that works and that only you can use.
Re: My Emacs eye candy
#24I want to switch to one of those Emacs candy looking setup, but it always ends up being a lot less fun once you have it installed and nothing works as you expects, the whole thing looks like grand father software and the UX is beyond bad. Sure, if you put up with the pain of setting it all up, eventually, you have something that works and that only you can use.
Spacemacs has decent defaults, is easily extendable, and looks pretty good too.
Re: My Emacs eye candy
#25I want to switch to one of those Emacs candy looking setup, but it always ends up being a lot less fun once you have it installed and nothing works as you expects, the whole thing looks like grand father software and the UX is beyond bad. Sure, if you put up with the pain of setting it all up, eventually, you have something that works and that only you can use.
Re: My Emacs eye candy
#26[0]: https://github.com/rougier/nano-emacs
Re: My Emacs eye candy
#27Re: My Emacs eye candy
#28Re: My Emacs eye candy
#29I want to switch to one of those Emacs candy looking setup, but it always ends up being a lot less fun once you have it installed and nothing works as you expects, the whole thing looks like grand father software and the UX is beyond bad. Sure, if you put up with the pain of setting it all up, eventually, you have something that works and that only you can use.
The extensibility and customizability of Emacs typically means that bad UX is user error. There is a barrier to entry, but if you don't want to go past that, it's no big deal. I'm not sure that's the editor's fault though.
Re: My Emacs eye candy
#30The linked theme looks nothing like the screenshots