Earlier quoted context omitted.
The US has 13 million hungry children, whether OP is from Europe or the Moon. That's cool your church throws away food and your local homeless people aren't literally starving, but we don't need to rely on anecdata for this one.
My mother was a public school teacher in a very poor district. Realistically, the social science researchers that study these things are often well-off academics who have no idea about the reality on the ground. The majority of hungry children are due to flat out parental neglect. Should the parents be interested in availing themselves of the resources, they would have food for their kids. Unfortunately, the social s…
However.
13 million hungry children are 13 million hungry children. A government can't just blame their parents and avoid any responsibility; they still gotta feed them.
You don't get to just ignore the problem by pointing at all the food wasted in America either - the 13 million kids are still hungry.
Those children won't learn properly, they won't feel safe, they'll have lifelong problems. We'll all have problems because of their problems.
We'll end up paying for it as a society, in 13 million ways; far more than it would cost to just _feed them_.
And the point - if you remember - is the inequality of it all. There are neglectful wealthy parents, just as there are neglectful poor parents - but only the poor kids are going to school hungry. In a country of such incredible wealth!
If we spent as much money feeding the hungry as we did on interest alone for the "war on terror", we'd have the whole planet fed 7 times over. The money is there - but it's dangerously unequally distributed.