A Perspective on Ukraine
lcamtuf.substack.com
A Perspective on Ukraine
1–10 of 24 posts
Re: A Perspective on Ukraine
#2Re: A Perspective on Ukraine
#3Actually, Nazi Germany was filled with nostalgia coupled with bitterness over the treaty of Versailles. They felt hard done by in WW1, and wanted to reclaim their rightful place as rulers of Europe. And of course xenophobia, genocide and atrocities come along for the ride when you put your trust in a strongman who goes to imperialist war.
Re: A Perspective on Ukraine
#4> In contrast to Nazi Germany, the days of the Soviet Union are not a point of national shame; former communist dignitaries are not banished from public life, streets and entire towns still bearing their names. Nostalgia coupled with bitterness continues to define Russian politics. Actually, Nazi Germany was filled with nostalgia coupled with bitterness over the treaty of Versailles. They felt hard done by in WW1, an…
Re: A Perspective on Ukraine
#5> In contrast to Nazi Germany, the days of the Soviet Union are not a point of national shame; former communist dignitaries are not banished from public life, streets and entire towns still bearing their names. Nostalgia coupled with bitterness continues to define Russian politics. Actually, Nazi Germany was filled with nostalgia coupled with bitterness over the treaty of Versailles. They felt hard done by in WW1, an…
Poorly worded, I suspect. I think the comparison is how modern Germany treats the nazi part of their past to how modern Russia treats the Soviet part of their past.
Re: A Perspective on Ukraine
#6[flagged]
> Citation requested.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Territorial_evolution_of_Russi...
Re: A Perspective on Ukraine
#7[flagged]
Wasn't PNAC a non-government think-tank?
Re: A Perspective on Ukraine
#8[flagged]
> Otherwise, this is just agitprop.
On whos side?
Will anybody honestly argue about Russia's expansionist policy? After events which can be interpreted as a solid confirmation of that? Will anybody honestly willing to twist words and images as much as to question this? If so, what's the dictionary which can be agreed upon, so the dialog is possible at all, at the level of "citation requested"? Where's the evidence that if a picture is presented which describes the events the discussion won't move to the critique of the description, not to the conclusions the picture was meant to illustrate?
Or, in other words, who's doing agitprop here?
Re: A Perspective on Ukraine
#9[flagged]
https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/lseih/2020/07/01/there-is-no-ukraine...
https://time.com/6150046/ukraine-statehood-russia-history-pu...
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/11/01/opinion/ukraine-war-natio...