Live data from Hacker News

Twitter lacks many features to be a true Mastodon replacement (2022)

aus.social

131–136 of 136 posts

Re: Twitter lacks many features to be a true Mastodon replacement (2022)

#131

[flagged]

> Twitter has this even more advanced feature called self de-federation. You activate it by simply scrolling away, closing the browser tab, taking a break, or even... going outside..

It seems the majority of Mastodon users have already utilized this feature of Twitter. Some have even shut down their Twitter accounts.

Re: Twitter lacks many features to be a true Mastodon replacement (2022)

#132

Mastodon is a wasteland. It can't compete with the engagement and exposure you can get on Twitter. For a social network, any feature parity is irrelevant if it can't reach critical mass.

With 1/100th the users, many Mastodon users report much more and valuable engagement on Mastodon than Twitter.

Re: Twitter lacks many features to be a true Mastodon replacement (2022)

#133
post #30

“Mastodon” as a product name, to me, doesn’t sound inviting at all. Evokes associations with masturbate, Mammoth and the general sense of something big, dark and clunky. If you have used the product and like it, I’m sure you won’t care about the name, or even come to like and cherish it. But for an outsider who just hears about this thing I would argue that it’s not very approachable.

Apparently my mind isn't in the gutter like yours, but after using it, it's vastly better than Twitter ever was, and I left more than a year ago so I can't speak to what Twitter is now, but I hear it's going downhill.

Re: Twitter lacks many features to be a true Mastodon replacement (2022)

#134
post #30

“Mastodon” as a product name, to me, doesn’t sound inviting at all. Evokes associations with masturbate, Mammoth and the general sense of something big, dark and clunky. If you have used the product and like it, I’m sure you won’t care about the name, or even come to like and cherish it. But for an outsider who just hears about this thing I would argue that it’s not very approachable.

Apparently my mind isn't in the gutter like yours, but after using it, it's vastly better than Twitter ever was, and I left more than a year ago so I can't speak to what Twitter is now, but I hear it's going downhill.

I shared a personal perspective, while allowing that people using and likening the service might see things differently. Your response is that you disagree and therefore your mind is better than mine.

Quite strong a judgement about another person based on a sample size of two sentences.

Re: Twitter lacks many features to be a true Mastodon replacement (2022)

#135
post #30

“Mastodon” as a product name, to me, doesn’t sound inviting at all. Evokes associations with masturbate, Mammoth and the general sense of something big, dark and clunky. If you have used the product and like it, I’m sure you won’t care about the name, or even come to like and cherish it. But for an outsider who just hears about this thing I would argue that it’s not very approachable.

Open source people a notoriously terrible at naming thing, Mastodon is a prime example of that.

Too many syllables, too much negative phonetic connotation and any focus group would tell you there's about 3 people that know what a Mastodon was. Should've gone with Mamood or some such romanticized version of an elephant thingy.

Re: Twitter lacks many features to be a true Mastodon replacement (2022)

#136

[flagged]

> Twitter has this even more advanced feature called self de-federation. You activate it by simply scrolling away, closing the browser tab, taking a break, or even... going outside.. It seems the majority of Mastodon users have already utilized this feature of Twitter. Some have even shut down their Twitter accounts.

Wonderful. So what is the problem? All's well that ends well.
Post reply on HN