Our frictionless way to collect user feedback and the unexpected impact it had
1–7 of 7 posts
Re: Our frictionless way to collect user feedback and the unexpected impact it had
#2Your present wording will probably encourage a good number of default instinctive "yes" responses since it is a common question. On the other hand asking someone if they'd be disappointed if this was taken away from them requires a second of thought...and perhaps a more accurate response.
Re: Our frictionless way to collect user feedback and the unexpected impact it had
#3All this is good as long as you realize that asking "Are you happy?" is much different than asking something like "Would you be disappointed if our product vanished?". Your present wording will probably encourage a good number of default instinctive "yes" responses since it is a common question. On the other hand asking someone if they'd be disappointed if this was taken away from them requires a second of thought...…
As I mentioned in the post NOs turned out very valuable in a different way. They would let us know very quickly if something was wrong and that is the purpose of this box now. It allows us to actively engage customers that have had a problem that they probably wouldn't write us about. But they would express their unhappiness if expressing it is only a click away.
Re: Our frictionless way to collect user feedback and the unexpected impact it had
#4Re: Our frictionless way to collect user feedback and the unexpected impact it had
#5All this is good as long as you realize that asking "Are you happy?" is much different than asking something like "Would you be disappointed if our product vanished?". Your present wording will probably encourage a good number of default instinctive "yes" responses since it is a common question. On the other hand asking someone if they'd be disappointed if this was taken away from them requires a second of thought...…