Live data from Hacker News

Future Blues – Emily's Cowboy Bebop Page (1999)

futureblues.com

51–60 of 238 posts

Re: Future Blues – Emily's Cowboy Bebop Page (1999)

#53

The second domain I ever registered was for my ex-wife’s cartoon fan site for a particular Disney cartoon series back in ‘98. Her drive to digitize stills from the show and write character bios and episode summaries was something I never understood, but she was certainly dedicated. I’d imagine all of that kind of compulsion ends up on Wikia sites and such today, but back then it was do-it-yourself. She was writing HT…

I remember in the early wikipedia days, Jimmy Wales complaining (in a good natured way) how a bunch of anime series had more pages devoted to them on wikipedia then World War II.

I'm not sure how good natured it was. Eventually Jimmy founded Wikia/Fandom.com and later a lot of well-sourced fiction-work pages was expelled from Wikipedia, with Wikipedia admins (or whatever they are) bullying people into moving content to Fandom, in deletion discussions. Some remain due to some people putting up long fights. The difference in quality from the content we had in the 2000s in Wikipedia to the content we have today in Wikia/Fandom is abysmal. No sources, bad categorized, terrible interface. This was terrible for the internet.

I never particularly cared about those articles, but Fandom.com is such a terrible website that this whole move made me vow to never donate to Wikipedia or to anything involving Jimmy Wales ever again.

Re: Future Blues – Emily's Cowboy Bebop Page (1999)

#54

Aside from the Cowboy Bebop nostalgia hit, this site is a great example of how clear, creative, and fun sites were in the late 1990s. While I struggle to identify the many reasons why I think sites looked better back then, I think being simple and content focused are two of them.

>I think being simple and content focused are two of them. You mean you don't like newsletter subscription pop-ups? Or a virtual assistant chat window on the corner? Or auto-playing videos that follow you when you scroll down? Or a choice between "Accept all cookies" and "Learn more?"

You can close the auto-playing video by simply waiting 10 seconds for the “x close” button to appear, which is 5px high and 12px wide.

Re: Future Blues – Emily's Cowboy Bebop Page (1999)

#55
post #6

Aside from the Cowboy Bebop nostalgia hit, this site is a great example of how clear, creative, and fun sites were in the late 1990s. While I struggle to identify the many reasons why I think sites looked better back then, I think being simple and content focused are two of them.

Sites mostly didn't look this good though, they were even more garish colors and 'under construction' banners

Guilty as charged. Also don’t forget about frames, marquee text, and that smoking skeleton wearing sunglasses gif. :)

Re: Future Blues – Emily's Cowboy Bebop Page (1999)

#57
post #45
post #37

Earlier quoted context omitted.

To be fair, for 1999, this is an all around fantastic site.

It was updated for the Netflix series. So it's still maintained

Consistent updates for 24 years. Makes me feel bad I never stuck with anything that long in my life.

Re: Future Blues – Emily's Cowboy Bebop Page (1999)

#60
post #29
post #13

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Lack of ads, lack of SEO.

Sites from the late 90s had ads and SEO. Some pretty terrible ads like flashing banners, popups, and later Flash. In fact Flash bad reputation wasn't because the tech was bad, far from it, but because of how it was used, particularly in ads. Popup blockers were the ad blockers of the time, and the situation with popups was so bad that popup blocking became a standard feature of most browsers. As for SEO, it was crude…

SEO from that era involved putting a bunch of "keywords" in the same color text as the background at the bottom of the page.

Good times...

Post reply on HN