Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Ubuntu is getting slower

phoronix.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

11–20 of 20 posts

Re: Ubuntu is getting slower

#11

Post by briansmith »

delano wrote: post #2

There are a lot of superfluous details in this article. After doing a few initial benchmarks it should have been obvious that the largest performance decline occurs between the 7.04 and 7.10 releases. The article should have answered that question first before throwing 8.x into the mix. Also, don't use a laptop for benchmarking operating systems!

"Also, don't use a laptop for benchmarking operating systems!"

That is exactly the kind of thinking that results in Linux's poor performance on laptops.

Re: Ubuntu is getting slower

#12

Post by JoelSutherland »

delano wrote: post #9
JoelSutherland wrote: post #4

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Agreed. In my experience I have found that XP boots and runs faster than Ubuntu 8.10 on my laptop. This was not the case on the same machine back in the 7.04 days.

That's a different type of test. You're talking about testing the performance of your laptop with various configurations. This article is comparing the performance of several versions of Ubuntu and the reason you don't want to use a laptop for that is because laptops have significantly slower hard drives than desktop models (even at the same RPM). Also the laptop they're using has a 5400 RPM drive which doesn't help.

Why is it bad to use a slower hard drive for a benchmark comparing software? You haven't explained this yet.

Re: Ubuntu is getting slower

#13

Post by mdasen »

I've always found that benchmarks are not good at showing OS performance for desktop applications. Why? I don't really need raw speed. What I need is something that will allow me to switch tasks and use other applications while one is locking up/doing a ton.

BeOS was great at that. I'm guessing the new Comlpetely Fair Scheduler that is debuting in Intrepid is better in that way too. My use of Intrepid shows it to be noticably faster in my daily usage. However, I'm not compressing video. I'm running several apps at a time and need to switch between them a lot.

Re: Ubuntu is getting slower

#14

Post by delano »

JoelSutherland wrote: post #12
delano wrote: post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's a different type of test. You're talking about testing the performance of your laptop with various configurations. This article is comparing the performance of several versions of Ubuntu and the reason you don't want to use a laptop for that is because laptops have significantly slower hard drives than desktop models (even at the same RPM). Also the laptop they're using has a 5400 RPM drive which doesn't help.

Why is it bad to use a slower hard drive for a benchmark comparing software? You haven't explained this yet.

I answered that question in my reply to palish.

Re: Ubuntu is getting slower

#15

Post by delano »

briansmith wrote: post #11
delano wrote: post #2

There are a lot of superfluous details in this article. After doing a few initial benchmarks it should have been obvious that the largest performance decline occurs between the 7.04 and 7.10 releases. The article should have answered that question first before throwing 8.x into the mix. Also, don't use a laptop for benchmarking operating systems!

"Also, don't use a laptop for benchmarking operating systems!" That is exactly the kind of thinking that results in Linux's poor performance on laptops.

Does Linux perform poorly on laptops? I've never looked into it.

I'm not suggesting that performance tests should not be run on laptops. As I said in my reply to palish, When you're comparing software to software, hardware should not be a limiting factor unless you're testing for specific cases.

Re: Ubuntu is getting slower

#16

Post by lacker »

Harkins wrote: post #6
woodsier wrote: post #5

Eugh. I quit the site as soon as I saw it was divided into 10 pages. No thanks.

Yeah. I have a simple way to find out if Ubuntu is getting slower: 1. How many people are assigned to adding features and making upgrades? What level of authority do they have? 2. Same questions, but assigned to performance monitoring and enhancement. Software is such a product of the culture that produced it that sometimes you don't even need to run benchmarks.

I appreciate your angle but really the number of people working on a problem is a very bad indicator of how well the problem is being solved.

Re: Ubuntu is getting slower

#17

Post by lacker »

delano wrote: post #15
briansmith wrote: post #11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"Also, don't use a laptop for benchmarking operating systems!" That is exactly the kind of thinking that results in Linux's poor performance on laptops.

Does Linux perform poorly on laptops? I've never looked into it. I'm not suggesting that performance tests should not be run on laptops. As I said in my reply to palish, When you're comparing software to software, hardware should not be a limiting factor unless you're testing for specific cases.

I still don't understand. Hardware will always be a limiting factor in the sense that if you had better hardware, the software would run faster. So what's wrong with running tests on laptops, one of the main platforms operating systems are needed for.

Re: Ubuntu is getting slower

#19

Post by notdarkyet »

JoelSutherland wrote: post #4
palish wrote: post #3

Earlier quoted context omitted.

don't use a laptop for benchmarking operating systems! Why not? Laptops are poised to overtake desktop PCs. It seems valid (even necessary) to test your product on popular consumer configurations.

Agreed. In my experience I have found that XP boots and runs faster than Ubuntu 8.10 on my laptop. This was not the case on the same machine back in the 7.04 days.

This can simply be answered by looking at the number of start-up scripts that are being executed. If that number has increased relative to 7.04, then of course your boot time is going to be slower. There are not too many things inherently different between the past few releases in terms of booting.

Re: Ubuntu is getting slower

#20

Post by delano »

lacker wrote: post #17
delano wrote: post #15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Does Linux perform poorly on laptops? I've never looked into it. I'm not suggesting that performance tests should not be run on laptops. As I said in my reply to palish, When you're comparing software to software, hardware should not be a limiting factor unless you're testing for specific cases.

I still don't understand. Hardware will always be a limiting factor in the sense that if you had better hardware, the software would run faster. So what's wrong with running tests on laptops, one of the main platforms operating systems are needed for.

To clarify, a specific piece of hardware should not knowingly be a limiting factor unless you're testing for a specific case (for example, specifically testing for performance with a slow hard drive). I'm advocating a balance across all pieces of hardware.
Post reply on HN