Live data from Hacker News

“Single?” Lawn Signs Conquer the American Landscape

themetricsystem.rjmetrics.com

1–10 of 30 posts

Re: “Single?” Lawn Signs Conquer the American Landscape

#2
I was wondering what the background was also, as those signs are posted everywhere around where I live. Great investigation.

Even if the article wasn't worth reading (which it was), the first (and so far, only) comment is worth it alone: "You are the Upton Sinclair of lawn signs"

Re: “Single?” Lawn Signs Conquer the American Landscape

#6
I wonder how much of the company's secrecy is a reaction to the expected illegality of placing these lawn signs. I see them frequently on municipal or state property, and I'm sure they are frequently removed by public works crews. If cities could easily find the person responsible and bring littering/vandalism/whatever fines against the parent company, this business model would be nonviable. I suspect the system of sub-companies, satellite offices, and probably "subcontractors" that this organization uses is basically an elaborate legal ruse. Like how the mafia never has the top guys do anything illegal.

Perhaps some ambitious state attorney general will bring these guys up on RICO charges. :)

Re: “Single?” Lawn Signs Conquer the American Landscape

#7
post #2

I was wondering what the background was also, as those signs are posted everywhere around where I live. Great investigation. Even if the article wasn't worth reading (which it was), the first (and so far, only) comment is worth it alone: "You are the Upton Sinclair of lawn signs"

thanks yan

Re: “Single?” Lawn Signs Conquer the American Landscape

#8
I was thinking "franchise" from the first bullet point. The global reach of the internet is great, but many needs are local (think fast food). One solution to this problem is franchising. But, if the capital costs are low, you can do it with a single company and local offices, as they did here.

This model could easily be copied in another country (e.g. here in Australia), but it doesn't sound very groundbreaking (or much fun).

Half-way through, I felt a strong suspicion that the article would turn out to a device for gathering leads for "geekdating.com"...

Re: “Single?” Lawn Signs Conquer the American Landscape

#9
as much as you hate those....you gotta admit this stuff probably has incredible success rates. You start seeing those all the time you will go check it out. And one sign is probably seen by thousands of people, the one day it survives.

My question though, is why doesn't the city/state do something about it? I mean this is like littering but with your home address listed on it. Can't the cities/states charge a removal fee for this road spam?

Re: “Single?” Lawn Signs Conquer the American Landscape

#10
That is an awesome article. When I started seeing these signs, I swore it was an internet franchising scheme.

Also note, it was an awesome way to drive traffic to his company -- and let us all know what they do! Looks like it was even submitted by an rjmetrics guy.

Also interesting ... http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=355833

Post reply on HN