EU's AI Act: ChatGPT must disclose use of copyrighted training data
1–10 of 72 posts
Re: EU's AI Act: ChatGPT must disclose use of copyrighted training data
#2Re: EU's AI Act: ChatGPT must disclose use of copyrighted training data
#3how far should that go? should an AI recognize that all data generated by human input, should be recognized as such, and derivations of data, are of automated artificial origin.
should an AI be allowed to learn what property rights are, and how to manage or physically effectuate them?
Re: EU's AI Act: ChatGPT must disclose use of copyrighted training data
#4ChatGPT must be given a sense of ethics, is what i extend to from here. so we seem to be starting off with giving rightful attribution. how far should that go? should an AI recognize that all data generated by human input, should be recognized as such, and derivations of data, are of automated artificial origin. should an AI be allowed to learn what property rights are, and how to manage or physically effectuate them…
I'll be curious to see how this set of regulations helps put content attribution on a better path.
Stability AI, Midjourney, DeviantArt etc. have already been sued, so there will be a lot of action in the years ahead.
Re: EU's AI Act: ChatGPT must disclose use of copyrighted training data
#5I thought these things use a trawler style approach?
Bit like copilot is fond of spitting out copyrighted code I had assumed chatGPT would also have been trained without much regard to this
Re: EU's AI Act: ChatGPT must disclose use of copyrighted training data
#6Re: EU's AI Act: ChatGPT must disclose use of copyrighted training data
#7Re: EU's AI Act: ChatGPT must disclose use of copyrighted training data
#8If you can't innovate, regulate ;)
Re: EU's AI Act: ChatGPT must disclose use of copyrighted training data
#9It's so absolutely obvious that the concept of intellectual property is not going to survive. What's the point of this agonizing life support?
Re: EU's AI Act: ChatGPT must disclose use of copyrighted training data
#10It's so absolutely obvious that the concept of intellectual property is not going to survive. What's the point of this agonizing life support?
How about torturing companies who have abused IP/Copyright law for decades while regular users simply pirate and read/watch/listen to the things they want?