Live data from Hacker News

Spotify abandons Heardle less than a year after buying it

theverge.com

71–80 of 125 posts

Re: Spotify abandons Heardle less than a year after buying it

#71
post #19
post #8

Heardle was fun, but really needed more development. Why not use other parts of the song besides the intro? I think they also could broken it into genres or decades. I mostly lost interest because I'd go too many days with songs that I simply had no chance with. (I assume they are popular with the kids, but I'm out of touch)

https://heardledecades.com/ you're welcome!

Nice, this is great!

Re: Spotify abandons Heardle less than a year after buying it

#72
post #18

Oh dear. Less than a year. This is what happens when businesses follow and chase short-term hype cycles and end up wasting time and money in the end. The return on investment of this acquired startup is exactly $0. Facebook on the other hand with the Instagram acquisition gave returns into the tens of billions of dollars.

Say what you will about Facebook, but its acquisition strategy has generally been strong.

Instagram has to be an all-time steal for what they paid for it. They also own What's App, a juggernaut in its own right.

Facebook's acquisition of Oculus was reasonable. It does remain to be seen if they can truly harness it or not.

Re: Spotify abandons Heardle less than a year after buying it

#73

Spotify, get your shit together. You’ve wasted a fortune in podcasting and now you’ve destroyed your app UX. Nobody wants this crap. Everybody just wants better music discovery and instant access to their favorites.

I recently subscribed to YouTube Premium, which includes YouTube Music, and for the first time in my life a system is recommending music that I actually like on a regular basis. I've discovered entirely new artists and even genres. Can't recommend it enough.

Re: Spotify abandons Heardle less than a year after buying it

#75

Spotify, get your shit together. You’ve wasted a fortune in podcasting and now you’ve destroyed your app UX. Nobody wants this crap. Everybody just wants better music discovery and instant access to their favorites.

They've been actively destroying their UX for years now. I am so tired of them forcing their Podcasts and audio books and whatever else on me. The one thing I want Spotify to do well is algorithmic discovery. The Discover Weekly playlist is the only thing that keeps me on the service, and yet they make it more and more difficult to find. The position on the home screen is entirely random and unpredictable. The only r…

To be fair, I use Spotify mostly for podcasts and it's UX and search for Podcasts is also terrible.

Re: Spotify abandons Heardle less than a year after buying it

#76
post #37
post #32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

they get paid by Labels to promote certain songs and artists, similar to how labels pay radio to play only certain songs. Everything, from Amazon, to Spotify, to the Google Play Store wants you to click on promoted bullshit, not search for what you actually want. Welcome to the internet in 2023.

The difference should be that users pay Spotify for a subscription. Raise the prices if they need to, but don't try and have a subscription + "whatever ad bucks we can make" model.

Their advertising business is the only reason they succeeded and Rhapsody, Zune Pass, and Napster/PressPlay didn’t. It’s ingrained in the company

Re: Spotify abandons Heardle less than a year after buying it

#77
post #60

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> What is it with all these companies using the same UX patterns EVERYWHERE. any guesses?

please illuminate me, my conspiracy theories will get me flagged to oblivion.

the answer is really simple. monkey see, monkey do.

Re: Spotify abandons Heardle less than a year after buying it

#78
post #73

Spotify, get your shit together. You’ve wasted a fortune in podcasting and now you’ve destroyed your app UX. Nobody wants this crap. Everybody just wants better music discovery and instant access to their favorites.

I recently subscribed to YouTube Premium, which includes YouTube Music, and for the first time in my life a system is recommending music that I actually like on a regular basis. I've discovered entirely new artists and even genres. Can't recommend it enough.

We pay for Premium as well and I started using music because "Hey it's included." It quickly became my main platform mostly because it stays out of the way and plays music.

Re: Spotify abandons Heardle less than a year after buying it

#79
post #37

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The difference should be that users pay Spotify for a subscription. Raise the prices if they need to, but don't try and have a subscription + "whatever ad bucks we can make" model.

Their advertising business is the only reason they succeeded and Rhapsody, Zune Pass, and Napster/PressPlay didn’t. It’s ingrained in the company

I thought it was because the major labels are also the biggest shareholders, and therefore incentivized not to hamstring the company?

Re: Spotify abandons Heardle less than a year after buying it

#80
post #60

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> What is it with all these companies using the same UX patterns EVERYWHERE. any guesses?

please illuminate me, my conspiracy theories will get me flagged to oblivion.

I'm going to guess it's part A/B engagement testing and part copying the whatever is hot (TikTok). The engagement tests only show what's currently "working" and doesn't correspond to long-term resentment, like what you're seeing in the comments here and everywhere else.

In the end though, I don't think it matters. The majority of users will stay. Switching platforms means losing your friends, your familiarity, and your time.

Post reply on HN