Live data from Hacker News

ManyCam dishonored my lifetime license

amazingcto.com

11–20 of 311 posts

Re: ManyCam dishonored my lifetime license

#11

Has any company’s “lifetime” license lasted more than, say 5 years? 10? (I mean for software that is updated or requires a server of course). I like the jetbrains model well enough.

Lifetime software license is quite ok: you buy a version, you can use that version while it runs.

What is a real scam is lifetime services (storage/backups/emails/...).

Re: ManyCam dishonored my lifetime license

#12
The problem with such betrayal is, that companies names are all but smoke and mirrors by now. The reputational damage should be tracking with the leading employees. One customer betrayal travels along with the manager who caused it, to whatever company s/he touches. No matter how the company is named, no matter how much branding, one linked in api roll call later you know what you got.

Re: ManyCam dishonored my lifetime license

#13

Has any company’s “lifetime” license lasted more than, say 5 years? 10? (I mean for software that is updated or requires a server of course). I like the jetbrains model well enough.

My Arq backup lifetime license is 7 years to the date tomorrow, still getting all updates.

Re: ManyCam dishonored my lifetime license

#15
Happy Scale, a weight tracking app I really enjoy, had the opposite example: I bought a full license for some bucks some years ago, and later they decided to switch to a subscription based model to ensure funding.

Instead of going the "hey, here is a new version of the app, you need to subscribe now", they explicitly included a thank-you note directed at everyone that bought the "Premium In-App Purchase" at the beginning, stating that nothing will change for existing Premium Users, that invested in the app right from the start.

I definitely share the tone of the article, and cannot understand the reasoning behind such a decision. The fact that I read "MandyCam" instead of "ManyCam" at first, and was wondering what that kind of article is doing here, is just the anecdotal cherry on top.

Re: ManyCam dishonored my lifetime license

#16

Has any company’s “lifetime” license lasted more than, say 5 years? 10? (I mean for software that is updated or requires a server of course). I like the jetbrains model well enough.

Not sure if anybody ever bought a WinRAR license, but maybe they do?! :-)

Re: ManyCam dishonored my lifetime license

#17

Has any company’s “lifetime” license lasted more than, say 5 years? 10? (I mean for software that is updated or requires a server of course). I like the jetbrains model well enough.

Malwarebytes Premium; I've been carrying the same license since Windows 7.

Re: ManyCam dishonored my lifetime license

#18

Has any company’s “lifetime” license lasted more than, say 5 years? 10? (I mean for software that is updated or requires a server of course). I like the jetbrains model well enough.

NFT has entered the chat. In all seriousness though, I think the only lifetime licenses that come to mind are probably ones like JetBrains and old software where you had the install medium on a disk and a key to install it with and it required no software updates, assuming the software doesn't need the internet to verify, you're pretty much guaranteed what you paid for. Don't you miss lifetime ownership of software l…

An NFT wouldn’t do anything. It’s a new release of software and the lifetime license stopped working on it.

Re: ManyCam dishonored my lifetime license

#19
post #3

Wondering the last few years how long my Plex lifetime pass will last now.

The lifetime license is the same price as 3 years. Lifetime licenses are a lie anyway, nothing lasts forever. But if they cancel my „lifetime license“ before 3 or 5 years elapsed, I will be very, very angry.

Re: ManyCam dishonored my lifetime license

#20
post #14
post #5

Isn't this just breach of contract, plain and simple? Change of ownership should have little to do with it.

Most likely there is a clause that allows them to change the "Lifetime" subscription to anything they want.

I’m guessing that would fall under false advertising
Post reply on HN