> If you want your donation to help, at least check sites like Charity Navigator and Give Well and make a smart donation instead of blindly venmoing the Red Cross to help them fight the war against "administrative fees." Then the title of the post should really be: "Be careful of the charities you give your money to because many have negative externalities and haven't thought through the implication of their missions…
Never Give Money to Charity
11–20 of 27 posts
Re: Never Give Money to Charity
#12Has anyone else noticed the rise in retail companies asking "Would you like to round up for XYZ charity"? Am I pessimistic in thinking they're taking this money and donating it purely for free tax reduction?
Please explain to me how getting $1 and immediately donating it produces more than that $1 in tax reduction. It isn't about reducing taxes, it's about getting some sort of altruistic branding/advertising at little to no cost. It still actually costs the company money in customer throughput, signage, implementation, bookkeeping, etc...
Re: Never Give Money to Charity
#13Re: Never Give Money to Charity
#14Unless they removed something better, that sounds like a reasonable degradation of functionality, in that it still provides a clean water source.
Re: Never Give Money to Charity
#15The problem with the water program isn't that some pumps broke, it's that we need to build more: https://www.unicef.org/senegal/en/press-releases/africa-dras...
Your charities do actually think about these problems, and it's why they usually prefer your money and not your used stuff. It's also why charities do funny things like sell clothes or make villages have to also invest in the infrastructure.
I recommend the author give up writing and actually try to participate in a charity.
Re: Never Give Money to Charity
#16Re: Never Give Money to Charity
#17Has anyone else noticed the rise in retail companies asking "Would you like to round up for XYZ charity"? Am I pessimistic in thinking they're taking this money and donating it purely for free tax reduction?
at the end of the day, if the charity is actually receiving the money that the company claims they are giving, does it really matter the ultimate reason for the company's decision to give the money?
Re: Never Give Money to Charity
#18The writing style is too hyperbolic that it detracts from the argument it is trying to make. A certain amount of figurativeness is good to add dimension to an argument, but here it has been overdone.
As you say, 2 points in that terribly written article are valid around the damage that NGOs cause (destroying demand, not being sustainable) but it's mostly a gotcha at Susan and Tom, his fictional neighbours from his own clearly out of touch reality.
This shouldn't be in hackernews.
It's subpar at best.
Re: Never Give Money to Charity
#19The writing style is too hyperbolic that it detracts from the argument it is trying to make. A certain amount of figurativeness is good to add dimension to an argument, but here it has been overdone.
> without a local industry, they're [Kenya] never taking their economy past the point where they stop asking tourists to get special vaccines before they visit.
You need vaccines because diseases thrive in different climates, and the vaccines from your home government only cover- duh- the ones in your local climate.
Re: Never Give Money to Charity
#20The article argues that charity can be counterproductive, but we don't have to give to random charities where no one is paying attention to whether they're making things better. Instead of "never give money to charity" what about "always check charity reviews first"? As the article does eventually get to, the reviews on https://givewell.org can help you avoid the kind of disasters they open with.