11–13 of 13 posts
Odd article title. They never made a claim on content. This version of the EULA is more clearly written, but the previous was sufficient.
Odd article title. They never made a claim on content. This version of the EULA is more clearly written, but the previous was sufficient.
I don't see what's odd about the article title. It says they clarified the EULA. People misread the original as if it made a claim on content, so the new EULA clarifies that this is not the case.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't see what's odd about the article title. It says they clarified the EULA. People misread the original as if it made a claim on content, so the new EULA clarifies that this is not the case.
The "Excludes Claim on Content" part of the title implies that there was a claim on content before...
I see how you are reading "excludes a claim on content" as meaning a claim on content was removed. But what it actually means is that an exclusion of a claim on content was added.