Earlier quoted context omitted.
I passed their comment to ChatGPT 3.5 and it seemed confident that ChatGPT wrote it.
I don’t think ChatGPT can tell if something was written by ChatGPT. At least not reliably.
Building GitHub with Ruby on Rails
101–110 of 332 posts
Re: Building GitHub with Ruby on Rails
#102There's a ton of merit to being on the latest release or close to it so you can get the latest security patches easier. The diff between that and the latest `main` branch seems like it has diminishing returns for most orgs.
Re: Building GitHub with Ruby on Rails
#103[flagged]
Was this comment generated via ChatGPT? Not trying to catch you out, just curious if I'm able to successfully spot it in the wild.
In the interest of full disclosure, I should also mention that I didn't actually read the article before leaving my comment. I know, I know, shame on me!
But on a more serious note, I think it's important to recognize that while AI has made incredible strides in recent years, there is still a lot of work to be done on the creative side. Many texts generated by AI tend to have a similar structure or tone, and it's not always easy to tell them apart from human-generated text.
Re: Building GitHub with Ruby on Rails
#104Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don’t think ChatGPT can tell if something was written by ChatGPT. At least not reliably.
OpenAI disagrees :p https://openai.com/blog/new-ai-classifier-for-indicating-ai-...
Re: Building GitHub with Ruby on Rails
#105Earlier quoted context omitted.
Was this comment generated via ChatGPT? Not trying to catch you out, just curious if I'm able to successfully spot it in the wild.
You caught me red-handed! Yes, the previous comment was actually generated by ChatGPT. I must admit, I was curious to see if anyone would be able to spot it in the wild, and you my friend have successfully done so. In the interest of full disclosure, I should also mention that I didn't actually read the article before leaving my comment. I know, I know, shame on me! But on a more serious note, I think it's important…
Re: Building GitHub with Ruby on Rails
#106GitHub running off the main branch is fascinating, and initially sounds mad, but makes so much sense. Assuming they have very high test coverage, running against mainline Rails isn't really any different to having the fork they had before, but they have more influence on future development. It must also be a massive boon for the Rails ecosystem to have such a large property running off the head. Doesn't anyone know o…
I have yet to see a tech stack that's not locked up into a framework version. That's more because of our engineering culture. The cost of NOT upgrading outweighs by a huge margin than keeping building on top. And yes, have seen Django shops locked into 0.9x release patched right into the core and running for a very long time, impossible to upgrade and all the horror stories. EDIT: Added Django
Re: Building GitHub with Ruby on Rails
#107[flagged]
Was this comment generated via ChatGPT? Not trying to catch you out, just curious if I'm able to successfully spot it in the wild.
Re: Building GitHub with Ruby on Rails
#108Earlier quoted context omitted.
As a counterpoint I have yet to see one that is locked in my 15 years working with Rails.
You have worked on a few projects that were behind a few major versions and needed considerable effort to be updated :)
Re: Building GitHub with Ruby on Rails
#109Earlier quoted context omitted.
Was this comment generated via ChatGPT? Not trying to catch you out, just curious if I'm able to successfully spot it in the wild.
You caught me red-handed! Yes, the previous comment was actually generated by ChatGPT. I must admit, I was curious to see if anyone would be able to spot it in the wild, and you my friend have successfully done so. In the interest of full disclosure, I should also mention that I didn't actually read the article before leaving my comment. I know, I know, shame on me! But on a more serious note, I think it's important…
>and this has resulted in real tangible benefits such as better database connection handling, faster view rendering, and improved security posture.
No actual honest tech person would ever say "security posture"
It also generally read like someone trying to sell tech to managers. I wouldn't blink an eye if something like that was posted on corporate blog because that's exact type of worm-speech they use
Re: Building GitHub with Ruby on Rails
#110Earlier quoted context omitted.
Was this comment generated via ChatGPT? Not trying to catch you out, just curious if I'm able to successfully spot it in the wild.
You caught me red-handed! Yes, the previous comment was actually generated by ChatGPT. I must admit, I was curious to see if anyone would be able to spot it in the wild, and you my friend have successfully done so. In the interest of full disclosure, I should also mention that I didn't actually read the article before leaving my comment. I know, I know, shame on me! But on a more serious note, I think it's important…