Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Suddenly your program that wasn’t checking for errors, breaks. The memory that you didn’t manage properly becomes now a problem. Yeah, nobody deployed anything and ran it for months, even years, before Kubernetes.
Yes, they did, but did it really take less effort than running it on Kubernetes?
Kubernetes is hard
161–164 of 164 posts
Re: Kubernetes is hard
#162Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Kubernetes is an ecosystem for managing software deployed on a fleet. There's value in that even if it's two or three hosts. there's value yes, but there's also cost, and that cost is huge > Kubernetes on a managed platform just happens to cover many pieces that you still need to solve otherwise i do not need to solve the vast majority of things that kubernetes solves certainly not in 2-3 node deployments, very lik…
It's not a huge cost. This is ludicrous. Sign up for a free account on GCP and walk through their getting started guide and you'll have stuff running in under an hour. > your "fine" rests on a base level of knowledge which is enormous, certainly incompatible with p99 of users I doubt it. I have far, far more experience running services on bare metal pizza boxes in 48U racks in PoPs all over the world, but that is a b…
kubernetes is non-controversially more complex than running on bare metal
Re: Kubernetes is hard
#163Like with many other technologies, k8s' advantage is its ecosystem.