Live data from Hacker News

If you’re so smart, why aren’t you rich? Turns out it’s just chance

technologyreview.com

71–75 of 75 posts

Re: If you’re so smart, why aren’t you rich? Turns out it’s just chance

#71
post #58

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Effort without intelligence is just pointless toil though. Either this paper is saying it’s pure chance, in which case effort isn’t relevant, or some intelligence is required.

If you're saying "intelligence" as in greater than 75 IQ then sure. If you slide that scale any further you'll quickly be overweighting intelligence to success

Show me all of the company CEOs with an IQ of 80.

Re: If you’re so smart, why aren’t you rich? Turns out it’s just chance

#72

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Wonder what the title would have been if the simulation spit out the opposite result - “Not so lucky after all? Science confirms poverty caused by lack of intelligence, talent.”

The problem with studies like this and why they lack credibility is there probably wouldn’t have been a headline if the model didn’t spit out the result that wealth is created primarily by luck. They either wouldn’t have published the result, or they would have come up with a new model.

Oh definitely - the joke is that a headline like that wouldn’t exist in real life for exactly the reasons you mention.

Re: If you’re so smart, why aren’t you rich? Turns out it’s just chance

#73
> The most successful people are not the most talented, just the luckiest, a new computer model of wealth

Don’t use “wealth” and “success” interchangably. It’s a sad Americanism(?).

The smartest people I know never optimized any choices for wealth at all. That’s why they aren’t wealthy. Many chose careers in academia or culture, actively choosing income that might be 1/3 of what they could have made. But they chose it out of curiosity and love for what they are doing.

Others chose to prioritize family over finance. I consider many of them wildly successful too.

Re: If you’re so smart, why aren’t you rich? Turns out it’s just chance

#74

> The most successful people are not the most talented, just the luckiest, a new computer model of wealth Don’t use “wealth” and “success” interchangably. It’s a sad Americanism(?). The smartest people I know never optimized any choices for wealth at all. That’s why they aren’t wealthy. Many chose careers in academia or culture, actively choosing income that might be 1/3 of what they could have made. But they chose i…

Thank you. Wealth is a means, not an end. Many don't understand this until it's too late.

Re: If you’re so smart, why aren’t you rich? Turns out it’s just chance

#75
post #74

> The most successful people are not the most talented, just the luckiest, a new computer model of wealth Don’t use “wealth” and “success” interchangably. It’s a sad Americanism(?). The smartest people I know never optimized any choices for wealth at all. That’s why they aren’t wealthy. Many chose careers in academia or culture, actively choosing income that might be 1/3 of what they could have made. But they chose i…

Thank you. Wealth is a means, not an end. Many don't understand this until it's too late.

I hear it all the time but only in English. Someone is "really successful" meaning they are rich. Never mind they may be sick, alone, depressed, burned out, ... but they are "successful".
Post reply on HN