Live data from Hacker News

The Bitcoin whitepaper is hidden in every copy of macOS

waxy.org

241–250 of 451 posts

Re: The Bitcoin whitepaper is hidden in every copy of macOS

#241
post #29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Really though? I’m confident there are 100 RFCs alone that were more impactful.

Silicon Valley tech-bros know that the money-printer drives the malinvestment bubbles that feed them. They're natural enemies of a decentralized, deflationary currency.

Bitcoin is neither deflationary nor a currency.

Re: The Bitcoin whitepaper is hidden in every copy of macOS

#242
post #135

Better than a U2 album, that's for sure.

I still have nightmares about my iPhone and my BMW randomly playing that album with that cover picture when I entered the car.

I sold the car and even had to start iTunes to remove the album.

Re: The Bitcoin whitepaper is hidden in every copy of macOS

#244

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And also to support oppressive governments by helping work around sanctions?

You may not be aware of how Bitcoin has consistently aided people facing extreme and dire circumstances worldwide, caused by the sanctions you seem to hold in high esteem. Every time you cheer for sanctions, you're cheering for the suffering and death of the most vulnerable people in the world under the guise that somehow a miracle will arise and the malnourished and starving will topple an already oppressive regime.…

Any way around sanctions that helps me send money to my family in Russia is a way that is exploited by the dictator orders of magnitude more, maintaining the situation where my relatives need financial help in the first place (to say nothing about undermining world peace etc). Yes it is unfortunate.

Re: The Bitcoin whitepaper is hidden in every copy of macOS

#245
post #240

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Can you give some examples?

https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1945.txt the thing that lets us communicate like this :)

That's not quite right. If I recall correctly, HTTP predates the HTTP RFC by a few years. I agree that HTTP was more impactful than Bitcoin but I'm not sure about the RFC itself. Maybe.

Re: The Bitcoin whitepaper is hidden in every copy of macOS

#246
post #45

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And facilitating organized crime, terrorism, and investment scams.

Which of these do not happen when using conventional money?

You're missing the point. Cryptocurrencies are specifically designed to evade regulations. Everything else —efficiency, cost, convenience, usability— is sacrificed in order to achieve this goal.

Re: The Bitcoin whitepaper is hidden in every copy of macOS

#249
post #18

I would be willing to wager there is more inside that PDF than just the contents of the Bitcoin white paper. Curious if anyone has a hash sum handy

/System/Library/Image Capture/Devices/VirtualScanner.app/Contents/Resources/simpledoc.pdf sha256: b1674191a88ec5cdd733e4240a81803105dc412d6c6708d53ab94fc248f4f553 sha512: 2ac531ee521cf93f8419c2018f770fbb42c65396178e079a416e7038d3f9ab9fc2c35c4d838bc8b5dd68f4c13759fe9cdf90a46528412fefe1294cb26beabf4e crc32 (lol): 13af7d06 md5: d56d71ecadf2137be09d8b1d35c6c042 sha1: 8de2fdb04edce612738eb51e14ecc426381f8ed8

Both the sha256 and sha512 exactly match a copy of the whitepaper from 2017, so that would be a pretty sophisticated attack.

Re: The Bitcoin whitepaper is hidden in every copy of macOS

#250
post #204

Earlier quoted context omitted.

We had DHTs, we had blockchains, and double spending was solved at least 2 years before the bitcoin white paper. Satoshi combined them together in a novel form, for sure, but it’s still largely useless.

Any more background on how double spending was solved 2 years before bitcoin?

Sure. Whitepaper was released in 2008. Genesis block was in 2009.

In 2007 we had Combating Double-Spending Using Cooperative P2P Systems[0]. Prior to both the whitepaper and the genesis block, we had Distributed Double Spending Prevention[1].

These are all particular subsets of distributed consensus problems, which have been studied in the context of CS for at least 30+ years (Consensus in the Presence of Partial Synchrony[2]).

[0] https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4268195

[1] https://arxiv.org/abs/0802.0832

[2] http://groups.csail.mit.edu/tds/papers/Lynch/jacm88.pdf

Post reply on HN