Physical 3x3x3x3 hypercube and other physical 4d twisty puzzles [video]
1–10 of 33 posts
Re: Physical 3x3x3x3 hypercube and other physical 4d twisty puzzles [video]
#2Re: Physical 3x3x3x3 hypercube and other physical 4d twisty puzzles [video]
#3Re: Physical 3x3x3x3 hypercube and other physical 4d twisty puzzles [video]
#4Re: Physical 3x3x3x3 hypercube and other physical 4d twisty puzzles [video]
#5Re: Physical 3x3x3x3 hypercube and other physical 4d twisty puzzles [video]
#6gyro move kinds feel extremely artificial compared to the simplicity of all other canonical moves.
Re: Physical 3x3x3x3 hypercube and other physical 4d twisty puzzles [video]
#7Re: Physical 3x3x3x3 hypercube and other physical 4d twisty puzzles [video]
#8Re: Physical 3x3x3x3 hypercube and other physical 4d twisty puzzles [video]
#9I don't understand how that's a 3x3x3x3. While there are some 3x3 elements, there are only 2 layers and 2 side by side. What am I missing?
Re: Physical 3x3x3x3 hypercube and other physical 4d twisty puzzles [video]
#10But it drives home the reason why I parted ways with advanced math. There just came a point when the math no longer resonated with the natural world that I was comfortable living in.
Imaginary (and complex) numbers were the first real schism where my mind repelled the very idea.
Nonetheless, decades later, I would be talking with a friend who is much smarter than me. We were talking about the lossy nature of converting audio from the time domain to the frequency domain and back. I understood that phase information was lost in the translation (I also thought it was curious that the human brain seemed to be phase-agnostic and so could not perceive the difference when audio was round-tripped through the frequency domain).
"Oh," he said, "when you do a Fast Fourier transform to move audio into the frequency domain the phase information is represented by the imaginary part of a complex number."
Wait, what? So complex numbers have a real-world analog in constructing an FFT — a "real" algorithm that does real work?
I see now that the really smart people just understand the natural world much better than I do — or perhaps see it differently than I do.