21–30 of 34 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
You do know that he is a Marxist right
Why a Marxist would need to defend Muslim invasions? He is one of the many charlatans who posed as Marxist only to advance their agenda of Muslim glorification. There are many such examples. Famous script writer Javed Akhtar propagated his faith,degraded other faiths and yet declared himself an atheist. How convenient?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why a Marxist would need to defend Muslim invasions? He is one of the many charlatans who posed as Marxist only to advance their agenda of Muslim glorification. There are many such examples. Famous script writer Javed Akhtar propagated his faith,degraded other faiths and yet declared himself an atheist. How convenient?
How did Javed Akhtar propagate his faith?
- Batch no 786 saves life but Hindu idols are lifeless with no power.
- Namaz is good but idol worship is waste of resources.
- Muslim are true to their religion but Hindus are greedy.
- Any Sikh has to be joker.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
For those who don't know, the Aryan Invasion/Colonisation Theory has been thoroughly debunked; and is almost universally understood to be a fabrication of the British to justify their extractive exploitation of India. Any historical text written in the last few decades covering ancient India will attest to this. Today, it is referred to only by racists and colonialism apologists. jim_inont seems to be one.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
For those who don't know, the Aryan Invasion/Colonisation Theory has been thoroughly debunked; and is almost universally understood to be a fabrication of the British to justify their extractive exploitation of India. Any historical text written in the last few decades covering ancient India will attest to this. Today, it is referred to only by racists and colonialism apologists. jim_inont seems to be one.
[flagged]
> …complex game of political chess being played by Nur Jahan with her rival and stepson, Shah Jahan For some context, Shah Jahan is best known outside India as the king who commissioned and spent his fortune on the Taj Mahal. The description in the review drives home how when the British arrived, India was about a third of world GDP, Britain, not so much.
> The description in the review drives home how when the British arrived, India was about a third of world GDP, Britain, not so much. India's GDP share was much higher before the invading Mughal invasion started so they were part of the problem. See Angus Madison's historical list of the ten largest countries by GDP.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
For those who don't know, the Aryan Invasion/Colonisation Theory has been thoroughly debunked; and is almost universally understood to be a fabrication of the British to justify their extractive exploitation of India. Any historical text written in the last few decades covering ancient India will attest to this. Today, it is referred to only by racists and colonialism apologists. jim_inont seems to be one.
[flagged]
I'm late to this thread, but you can't post racial, national, or ethnic slurs to HN, regardless of which group you have a problem with.
As this account has been used exclusively for nationalistic/religious battle, I've banned it. Please don't create accounts to break HN's rules with.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
[flagged]
"Don't feed egregious comments by replying; flag them instead."