Gitlab foundation established to increase people’s lifetime earnings
11–20 of 41 posts
Re: Gitlab foundation established to increase people’s lifetime earnings
#12If Gitlab wants to increase peoples' lifetime earning, why not start with its own employees? Didn't they layoff hundreds of people?
Yes, they let go 130 employees a couple of months ago. They're also a company whose remote pay is dependent on location. So they're unwilling to pay people what they're actually worth.
They are also paying significantly less than their competitors. No wonder they are falling behind.
I have no clue what this "foundation" is, the wording is extremely vague.
Re: Gitlab foundation established to increase people’s lifetime earnings
#13If Gitlab wants to increase peoples' lifetime earning, why not start with its own employees? Didn't they layoff hundreds of people?
Yes, they let go 130 employees a couple of months ago. They're also a company whose remote pay is dependent on location. So they're unwilling to pay people what they're actually worth.
What is it with companies doing this? It never made sense to me that a company would pay me more or less depending on where I lived. If I'm doing the same work why should my location matter?
Re: Gitlab foundation established to increase people’s lifetime earnings
#14Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes, they let go 130 employees a couple of months ago. They're also a company whose remote pay is dependent on location. So they're unwilling to pay people what they're actually worth.
"They're also a company whose remote pay is dependent on location." What is it with companies doing this? It never made sense to me that a company would pay me more or less depending on where I lived. If I'm doing the same work why should my location matter?
But on a side note, this should make us blatantly clear that, all else being equal, our work has no inherent value.
Re: Gitlab foundation established to increase people’s lifetime earnings
#15I know they're just starting, but this is so vague... > grow their lifetime earnings through education, training, access to opportunities, and systems change on a global scale What is their actual plan? What opportunities? What systems? I hope they make a positive impact but so far it just seems like marketing hype.
There are some concrete examples here, but it really feels like most of the opportunities are around software as that's still the lowest-barrier, training-time-efficient, highest paying job you can learn remotely. That's by far the easiest way to reach their 1:100 investment/income ratio. https://gitlabfoundation.notion.site/Activities-47c282c91b54... https://gitlabfoundation.notion.site/Intervention-Points-50f...
We need a healthy, heterogeneous career market. Driving everyone to become programmers isn't it.
Re: Gitlab foundation established to increase people’s lifetime earnings
#16[1] https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1653482/000162828023...
Re: Gitlab foundation established to increase people’s lifetime earnings
#17Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes, they let go 130 employees a couple of months ago. They're also a company whose remote pay is dependent on location. So they're unwilling to pay people what they're actually worth.
"They're also a company whose remote pay is dependent on location." What is it with companies doing this? It never made sense to me that a company would pay me more or less depending on where I lived. If I'm doing the same work why should my location matter?
Re: Gitlab foundation established to increase people’s lifetime earnings
#18If Gitlab wants to increase peoples' lifetime earning, why not start with its own employees? Didn't they layoff hundreds of people?
Re: Gitlab foundation established to increase people’s lifetime earnings
#19If Gitlab wants to increase peoples' lifetime earning, why not start with its own employees? Didn't they layoff hundreds of people?
Yes, they let go 130 employees a couple of months ago. They're also a company whose remote pay is dependent on location. So they're unwilling to pay people what they're actually worth.
Every time GitLab comes up someone will bring this topic up.
San Francisco salaries are not a worldwide benchmark of people's worth.
There are valid reasons why GitLab doesn't pay engineers in Kenya $200k.
Should I also swing your logic the other way?
If an engineer in Kenya for $50k does the same work and output as you, a $200k engineer in SF, can we now say you're being overpaid 4x what you're actually worth?
If people don't understand why companies pays local labour market rates, either look at GitLab's income statement and multiply 2000 employees by your definition of "worth" or start your own business and show how everyone in the world can pay 8 billion people the same salaries. Good luck.
https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/total-rewards/compensation...
https://about.gitlab.com/blog/2019/02/28/why-we-pay-local-ra...
Re: Gitlab foundation established to increase people’s lifetime earnings
#20Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Massive over simplification but surely if everyone keeps trying to earn more money - that money has to come from somewhere, inflation happens and we're at where we are now all over again. The game is rigged. Humans do not all learn at the same rate. We will not be "where we are now all over again", as many people will be much smarter and more experienced.
They're talking about earning though - not learning.
Not everyone acquires this skill at the same rate. Some never acquire it. Some acquire it and leave it at an average level. Some are constantly trying to level up this skill.