Live data from Hacker News

Was there a U.S. nuclear weapons accident at a Dutch air base?

fas.org

1–10 of 96 posts

Re: Was there a U.S. nuclear weapons accident at a Dutch air base?

#3
It must be emphasized up front that there is no official confirmation that the image was taken at Volkel Air Base, that the bent B61 shape is a real weapon (versus a trainer), or that the damage was the result of an accident (versus a training simulation).

Re: Was there a U.S. nuclear weapons accident at a Dutch air base?

#4

It must be emphasized up front that there is no official confirmation that the image was taken at Volkel Air Base, that the bent B61 shape is a real weapon (versus a trainer), or that the damage was the result of an accident (versus a training simulation).

Exactly. Quite the chain of speculation built from a single image.

Re: Was there a U.S. nuclear weapons accident at a Dutch air base?

#10

It must be emphasized up front that there is no official confirmation that the image was taken at Volkel Air Base, that the bent B61 shape is a real weapon (versus a trainer), or that the damage was the result of an accident (versus a training simulation).

Exactly. Quite the chain of speculation built from a single image.

Officially there's no explanation for the image at all, but "It's some teenagers at my local high school, plus a lot of Photoshop" doesn't feel at all likely, does it?

The idea that it's Volkel seems reasonably solid unless somebody has photographs known to be from somewhere else which look like that. We know Volkel's B61s are stored in a place exactly like that, we know most US airbases don't look exactly like that even in Europe.

So the biggest open question is: Did they prang a real bomb or is that a training unit. I mean, one reason you put so much work into training is that people do prang real bombs and it's important they don't freak out and instead follow procedure. So both are actually likely.

Post reply on HN