This is as surprising to me as it is sad. 2 of 3 YMO members now gone at 70 and 71 which seems very young given the renown of Japanese longevity. Anyway, Beauty is a favorite album from my childhood so probably time for a re-listen.
Ryuichi Sakamoto has died
81–90 of 125 posts
Re: Ryuichi Sakamoto has died
#82Re: Ryuichi Sakamoto has died
#83Earlier quoted context omitted.
The piano fits for Sakamoto over a sword or a dam because he is a musician who spent his life with the piano as his primary instrument. It's where he is most experienced and he has a much closer relationship to that than a dam or a sword. Ivory is also typically only used for the keys, and doesn't actually impact the tuning of the instrument.
He was also referencing a specific piano, an old Yamaha piano in the gymnasium of Miyagi Agricultural High School, which had been damaged by the tsunami. It seems very unlikely that a high school Yamaha grand piano had ivory keys.
They exist, but they are notoriously difficult to tune and keep in tune compared to iron framed pianos. I think they have stopped making them for quite a while. I find it hard to imagine a high school using an instrument requiring so much maintenance.
If it was indeed a wooden framed piano, it was probably more of an antique than a practical instrument, and so, maybe with ivory keys, though again I doubt it.
Re: Ryuichi Sakamoto has died
#84Earlier quoted context omitted.
Though we ourselves are by definition part of the universe and thus nature.
“Nature” and “natural” are normative terms that commonly distinguish the world altered and created by humans from the world that isn’t altered or created by humans. It’s clear in context that Sakamoto is using the term accurately in a normative sense, not making a semantic error.
After all, if everything humanity does is pollution, why single any specific acts out?
Re: Ryuichi Sakamoto has died
#85My mom was the babysitter of his son (with Norika) for a few years in the 90s. I was around 6-7 years old. I remember Norika as being incredibly kind. She would let my mom bring me to their home often while babysitting their toddler. We had just immigrated from China, so I was decked out in very fobby clothing. Norika took me to The Gap one day and bought a whole new wardrobe for me. I'm still grateful for her kind g…
Re: Ryuichi Sakamoto has died
#86My mom was the babysitter of his son (with Norika) for a few years in the 90s. I was around 6-7 years old. I remember Norika as being incredibly kind. She would let my mom bring me to their home often while babysitting their toddler. We had just immigrated from China, so I was decked out in very fobby clothing. Norika took me to The Gap one day and bought a whole new wardrobe for me. I'm still grateful for her kind g…
Is this the same "Miss Sakamoto" who as the wife of Ryuchi, peripherally involved in the production of Thomas Dolby's She Blinded Me With Science, inspired the quote from the scientist in that song?
Re: Ryuichi Sakamoto has died
#87My wife and I were just talking yesterday about how we hoped Ryuichi would make another album before he died.
“12” was released just this last January. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/12_(Ryuichi_Sakamoto_album)
Re: Ryuichi Sakamoto has died
#88Earlier quoted context omitted.
Though we ourselves are by definition part of the universe and thus nature.
“Nature” and “natural” are normative terms that commonly distinguish the world altered and created by humans from the world that isn’t altered or created by humans. It’s clear in context that Sakamoto is using the term accurately in a normative sense, not making a semantic error.
Re: Ryuichi Sakamoto has died
#89Sakamoto had a way of doing and thinking through things better than many, but still with some sort of simplicity. I mean, he was in a class of his own even for something as mundane as washing hands: https://youtu.be/VnV4GGXIhfM (of course, this hits differently now than when it first came out)
RIP Ryuichi
Re: Ryuichi Sakamoto has died
#90Earlier quoted context omitted.
“Nature” and “natural” are normative terms that commonly distinguish the world altered and created by humans from the world that isn’t altered or created by humans. It’s clear in context that Sakamoto is using the term accurately in a normative sense, not making a semantic error.
This would imply every human action is 'unnatural'...
If you yourself can cut a tree down and do whatever else to make a piano, there's no world created by humans. It'll take you a while but in the end there's only you and your shiny new piano and nature.
If there is a distributed process with countless people and organizations using intricate mechanisms to build components of mechanisms that build mechanisms that extract natural resources for building mechanisms for preparing different parts that are eventually put together as a piano (which itself is almost a side effect, a minor detail almost no participant of the process sees or even knows about)... that's a world. If you click a button and have this thing show up at your house and not know a bit about what goes into it much less do it yourself... that's a world.