The underlying truth behind all such discussions is that too many people focus on the mechanics of content hosting and delivery but have nothing special to actually share. So they will spend all their time engineering the perfect blog site from scratch or moving from platform to platform looking for an ideological fit while no one really cares about consuming any of their output. My advice is always to forget about t…
In college, I did my calculus homework on blank printer paper using Sharpie markers. I could only fit one integral per page, maybe two if I was lucky, so I’d turn in these 15-page stapled assignments. It was calculus all the same, and I got great grades. I think the purpose of this comment is to reinforce that the medium doesn’t matter — if you focus on the content itself, you’ll progress.
Own your work
61–70 of 113 posts
Re: Own your work
#62The best solution is what the Indieweb folks called POSSE: Publish on your Own Site , Syndicate Elsewhere: https://indieweb.org/POSSE For instance, I might publish a clip on my own site first, then mirror it to places like YouTube, TikTok and Reddit so more people find it. Or post an article on my own site first, then repost it on Medium and Substack (with a canonical saying my own version is the original if possible…
Re: Own your work
#63Counterpoint - this is a bit like saying "sell the product from your own website, you'll get 100% of the sales and own the customer!" Totally true, but good luck getting the customer to your site. Way easier to put your product on Amazon, eBay, Etsy, wherever people are already shopping AS WELL - and take a hit on profit (at least initially) and figure out how you build off that. Leverage all the social media and blo…
Re: Own your work
#64Re: Own your work
#65It's clear enough who owns a speech, and like the OP I'm in favor of hosting your own speeches (and essays). But who owns a conversation? Does this rugged individualist approach to hosting one's own work end the possibility of online discussion? Or do we just hold our nose and do the hypocritical thing and host comments - encouraging others to NOT own their work?
Re: Own your work
#66The idea here is something that allows you quick recreation and copying. You can just copy over static files. You can put it on your Dropbox, Google Drive, etc. and even on your external hard disk or whatever backup solution you use.
Usually the main dynamic thing for writers is actually creating posts. So if that is some offline software that just spits out static files it becomes incredibly resilient.
One might think static site generators, like Hugo, but there is also GUI applications that essentially equal what the admin of a blog or CMS see.
Re: Own your work
#67The underlying truth behind all such discussions is that too many people focus on the mechanics of content hosting and delivery but have nothing special to actually share. So they will spend all their time engineering the perfect blog site from scratch or moving from platform to platform looking for an ideological fit while no one really cares about consuming any of their output. My advice is always to forget about t…
I must build static site compilers and markdown dialects so that my children may have liberty to write prose and poetry.
Re: Own your work
#68The best solution is what the Indieweb folks called POSSE: Publish on your Own Site , Syndicate Elsewhere: https://indieweb.org/POSSE For instance, I might publish a clip on my own site first, then mirror it to places like YouTube, TikTok and Reddit so more people find it. Or post an article on my own site first, then repost it on Medium and Substack (with a canonical saying my own version is the original if possible…
Is there an automatic way to do this? Like a SaaS where I paste my article URL, chose where to replicate, and it does automatically? Bonus points if it gets them from a feed.
Re: Own your work
#69Earlier quoted context omitted.
I must build static site compilers and markdown dialects so that my children may have liberty to write prose and poetry.
This, and also "The blog is about literate programming, and the content of the blog is the code that produce the blog"
Re: Own your work
#70If you thought that Musk was going to be beneficial for Twitter in any way, you were deluding yourself about him. Tesla and SpaceX were only successful because competent people did all the thinking and spent a lot of time managing upwards.