Don't be evil.
Google is reporting itself as a malware distributor.
11–20 of 43 posts
Re: Google is reporting itself as a malware distributor.
#12Earlier quoted context omitted.
The year is supposed to be the first year the work was created. You can do 2008-2012 if you want though (and let the end year automatically update). But since that's the assumption if you don't include the end year, there isn't any reason to do it.
Facebook © 2012 The content of Facebook wasn't first created in 2012, so I'm not sure if you're correct. In fact, I've noticed that the majority of sites don't include a date-range. Regardless, thanks for the info.
Didn't Facebook just update their website thus having a new copy write?
Re: Google is reporting itself as a malware distributor.
#13[deleted]
Re: Google is reporting itself as a malware distributor.
#14Earlier quoted context omitted.
Facebook © 2012 The content of Facebook wasn't first created in 2012, so I'm not sure if you're correct. In fact, I've noticed that the majority of sites don't include a date-range. Regardless, thanks for the info.
Didn't Facebook just update their website thus having a new copy write?
No, it's a mistake, they should have left the original date. If you update it you are supposed to do year, year, year or a range.
Re: Google is reporting itself as a malware distributor.
#15Earlier quoted context omitted.
Facebook © 2012 The content of Facebook wasn't first created in 2012, so I'm not sure if you're correct. In fact, I've noticed that the majority of sites don't include a date-range. Regardless, thanks for the info.
Didn't Facebook just update their website thus having a new copy write?
I don't know. They might have; but I doubt Microsoft, Yahoo, and Twitter did as well.
© 2012 Microsoft
Copyright © 2012 Yahoo! Inc.
© 2012 Twitter
Re: Google is reporting itself as a malware distributor.
#16Heh, working as intended I suppose.
Re: Google is reporting itself as a malware distributor.
#17What IS interesting is that you can actually put in any other domain and find the results of malware diagnostics.
http://www.google.com/safebrowsing/diagnostic?site=http://ww...
http://www.google.com/safebrowsing/diagnostic?site=http://te...
http://www.google.com/safebrowsing/diagnostic?site=http://ok... (one Czech discussion server I visit time from time)
and so on.
Re: Google is reporting itself as a malware distributor.
#18Earlier quoted context omitted.
Didn't Facebook just update their website thus having a new copy write?
No, it's a mistake, they should have left the original date. If you update it you are supposed to do year, year, year or a range. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_notice
I still doubt that Facebook, Microsoft, Yahoo, Twitter, etc. are all mistaken in listing the current year in their copyright. That seems implausible.
Re: Google is reporting itself as a malware distributor.
#19Earlier quoted context omitted.
Didn't Facebook just update their website thus having a new copy write?
I don't know. They might have; but I doubt Microsoft, Yahoo, and Twitter did as well. © 2012 Microsoft Copyright © 2012 Yahoo! Inc. © 2012 Twitter
I quote the US government: http://www.copyright.gov/help/faq/faq-definitions.html
"and the year of first publication"