Earlier quoted context omitted.
What does the CDC have to gain by downplaying the seriousness of this disaster?
> What does the CDC have to gain by downplaying the seriousness of this disaster? Don't you remember what happened to 9/11 workers who then died of specific forms of cancer? The US government fully knew that working there was dangerous for their health due to the toxic dust. What executive working at the CDC now will still be there in 15 years? That won't be their problem...
Vinyl chloride exposure risk, in contrast, is pretty well understood; we've been working with it for over 100 years (and crashing trainloads of it for about that long).
I agree the EPA (not CDC) made errors after 9/11, but they were working with a novel threat.