141–150 of 280 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I am getting super tired of these responses. Yes, I have tried it. Please converse in good faith. GPT-4 has never, not once, in dozens of hours of use, asked me a clarifying question. It cannot understand things.
ReAct will, example: https://github.com/neilellis/coding-with-gpt-4/blob/main/lan...
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Bro, GPT-4 can absolutely not understand new information. Try to teach it a grammar. It can't learn a grammar. Anyone can learn a new grammar. Not GPT-4. GPT-4 does not ask clarifying questions. It does not understand things.
I don't know what your bar for clarifying question is, but I have definitely had it ask me for more info when I forget to put it into the prompt.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Bro, GPT-4 can absolutely not understand new information. Try to teach it a grammar. It can't learn a grammar. Anyone can learn a new grammar. Not GPT-4. GPT-4 does not ask clarifying questions. It does not understand things.
I just tried this small example right now as a test: https://i.imgur.com/p4s7HCU.png
Are you people all bots? LOL.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
There will be no AGI during our lifetime. It seems weird to me that people that should understand how ML works (e.g. sama) instead of educating laypeople about about how this actually works and the huge limits the technology has, start talking nonsense about AGIs like some random scifi fan at a convention. Depressing.
How can you speak with such confidence, when Hinton and Ilya Sutskever can not? Hinton even said it is possible in next 5-10 years. While, you can believe whatever you believe, please don't bash people as laypeople or something as nonsense.
Is all the discussion in this thread about the abilities of ChatGPT in 5-10 years, or is it about its abilities right now?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
How can you speak with such confidence, when Hinton and Ilya Sutskever can not? Hinton even said it is possible in next 5-10 years. While, you can believe whatever you believe, please don't bash people as laypeople or something as nonsense.
The same confidence of those already planning for the advent, that will never be, of AGI. I see a lot of unmotivated enthusiasm for the "new" thing, the opinions of Hinton should be considered valid if the reasoning makes sense, not just because the source is Hinton. No idea why he said that it's possible in 10 years. Not trying to bash anyone, I just meant normal people, outside of the field. Enthusiastic nonsense i…
It's because he's been saying that for 40 years.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I just tried this small example right now as a test: https://i.imgur.com/p4s7HCU.png
So you asked to have it ask clarifying questions, and it still didn't?! Are you people all bots? LOL.
I strongly suspect the first AGI will come sooner than expected on the back of a "glue" AI that can intelligently bond together a web of narrow AIs and utilities. I got access to the wolfram plugin for chatGPT, and it turned it from a math dummy to a math genius overnight. A small step for sure, but a hint of what's to come.
Whose to say that AGI isn't already here but relatively slow? It does seem to me that as more and more outputs of AI are pushed through various systems, that will eventually feed back into various AI. In 2017 an Anon on 4chan proposed that our society, due to content marketing and AI stock trading, is already run by a sort of emergent intelligence, and he proposed that this is why things seem to be 'getting crazy' la…
You can outthink a human by thinking 1000x faster, or by having 1000 minds think on the same problem. There's a reason everything explodes when communication technology gets better. Imagine how long it would take to coordinate the fundamental pieces of a laptop computer by pigeon mail or horseback.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
animals which use tools: great apes (gorillas, chimpanzees, orangutans), monkeys, otters, dolphins, some bird species, octopus, and a few crocodilian species. now LLMs are on this list. a thing which isn't born, doesn't experience, can be copied and instantiated a million times, and a single improvement can be basically immediately propagated to all instances. a very unfamiliar thing with very familiar capabilities.…
"We'll be dealing with it for the rest of our civilization's lifetime." Exactly.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Humans have been doing all of this and more, for a very long time. This simply exposes all of the cracks in the foundations of our society. There are severely exploitable issues, and we may wind up with a planet-level chaos monkey. Ghostbusters had the stay-puft marshmallow man. Will the form of our destroyer be the woot monkey?
Yes it was possible. Steel was also available before the industrial revolution... but guess what, it's called a revolution for reason? It become cheap enough to upend preexisting social status quo. It was a social phase transition caused by technology. We're dealing with a very nascent AI revolution right now. A social phase transition has already started: on the forefront there are graphic artists (midjourney v5 is…
The industry was a joke prior to this. No offense.