Live data from Hacker News

HuggingGPT: Solving AI tasks with ChatGPT and its friends in HuggingFace

arxiv.org

131–140 of 280 posts

Re: HuggingGPT: Solving AI tasks with ChatGPT and its friends in HuggingFace

#131
post #17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

We've been "moving too fast" since we figured out agriculture. It's fine. The world as you know it will change irreversibly; you'll long for the simplicity of youth; you will bemoan the state of the world we have left for our children... just like every generation before us did. It'll all be fine. Enjoy the ride, it's called life, and it's better than it ever has been.

The power to seriously harm nations may be in the hands of tens of thousands of individuals within a few years. Things might just be different this time.

That's already the case

Re: HuggingGPT: Solving AI tasks with ChatGPT and its friends in HuggingFace

#132
post #71

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How can you speak with such confidence, when Hinton and Ilya Sutskever can not? Hinton even said it is possible in next 5-10 years. While, you can believe whatever you believe, please don't bash people as laypeople or something as nonsense.

The same confidence of those already planning for the advent, that will never be, of AGI. I see a lot of unmotivated enthusiasm for the "new" thing, the opinions of Hinton should be considered valid if the reasoning makes sense, not just because the source is Hinton. No idea why he said that it's possible in 10 years. Not trying to bash anyone, I just meant normal people, outside of the field. Enthusiastic nonsense i…

We have these guys calling themselves "experts on intelligence" just because they know the structure of the components of the neural net. It's like neurologists saying they are experts in consciousness because they know how neurons function and grow. Thankfully doctors don't have nearly the same levels of hubris as tech bros.

Re: HuggingGPT: Solving AI tasks with ChatGPT and its friends in HuggingFace

#133

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> The philosophical zombie is an excellent example of the extent of post shifting we're capable of. I was with you until here. That has nothing to do with this. That argument is about separating intelligence from having a subjective experience, not moving goalposts for intelligence.

It's a tangential relation but it's a relation. I don't think i would say it has nothing to do with it. Goal posts shifting in the field of machine learning isn't just about the posts for defining intelligence. It's broader and deeper than that. I brought it up because i thought it fit the point i was driving at. Humans/people don't see subjective experience. I don't know that you're actually having some subjective e…

>> when i show the output that clearly demonstrates reasoning and understand, the arguments quickly shift to "it's not real understanding!" and it's honestly very bizarre. What kind of meaningful distinction can't show itself, can't be tested for? If it does exist then it's not meaningful.

I agree with you totally. Here's some output that clearly demonstrates reasoning and understanding:

  All men are mortal.
  Socrates is a man.
  Therefore, Socrates is mortal.
I just copy-pasted that from wikipedia. Copy/paste understands syllogisms!

Explain that!

Re: HuggingGPT: Solving AI tasks with ChatGPT and its friends in HuggingFace

#134
post #44

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'll take the other side of that bet

Feel free to do so, we need something to replace crypto after all. And also, sometime I wonder how many people hold those kind of opinions on AGI(imminent, doable, worthy of being discussed) because they sincerely believe in some nonsense like the basilisk thing for example.

I believe in AGI because I'm a materialist so see no reason why we couldn't create artificial brains.

Re: HuggingGPT: Solving AI tasks with ChatGPT and its friends in HuggingFace

#135
post #20
post #19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I agree, I suspect AGI is possible right now with a similar system only slightly more sophisticated than this one. The right "glue" for existing models, and plugins to existing data sources all coordinated in a system. GTP-4 would do the managing, and handling, and some simple template API and handler script would allow it to call instances of itself or other models, track recursion depth, and automatically remind GT…

It also, in my pay opinion, needs a memory store. I need to be able to save something to a variable and call back that exact variable. Right now, because it’s just pure text input of the whole conversation, it can forget or corrupt it’s “memory”. Even something like writing a movie script doesn’t work if it constantly forgets characters names or settings or plot points.

lay*

Re: HuggingGPT: Solving AI tasks with ChatGPT and its friends in HuggingFace

#136
post #14
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Everyone can see the writing on the wall that they need to be a part owner of the production, because the worker will not be needed. So its a land grab in every direction right now for the thing that is going to co-opt the means of production.

what do the owners of production do when the 6 billion workers decide they don't like not being able to eat?

Give them a bit of food and a lot of entertainment...

Re: HuggingGPT: Solving AI tasks with ChatGPT and its friends in HuggingFace

#137
post #31

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> it turned it from a math dummy to a math genius overnight Imo your post fundamentally misunderstands a few things, but mainly how Wolfram works. Wolfram can be seen as a "database" that stores a lot of human mathematical information (along with related algorithms). Wolfram does not make new math . A corollary here is that AGI needs to have the ability to create new math to be truly AGI. But unless fed something lik…

Would AlphaZero or AlphaGo meet your requirements then? They both created "new Chess / Go" strategies and insights that GMs and top engines hadn't seen before.

it would meet mine. not sure is chatgpt does though

Re: HuggingGPT: Solving AI tasks with ChatGPT and its friends in HuggingFace

#138
post #69

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Totally agree. Recently read Finite and Infinite Games[1] and The Grasshopper: Life, Games, and Utopia[2] and I'm more or less convinced motivations are always essentially games. [1] https://www.amazon.com/Finite-Infinite-Games-James-Carse/dp/... [2] https://www.amazon.com/Grasshopper-Third-Games-Life-Utopia/d...

Thanks for book refs. Would you recommend any of them for a bright teen? [1] sounded like a good candidate.

[1] is an exceptional book for a bright teen, especially so if you suspect the teen leans into their intelligence/abilities to gauge their self worth (I don't know a single person, let alone teen who doesn't do this). The book's main theme states that being a good player has nothing to do with skill, but rather with the ability to create playful environments that encourage growth, humility, and most importantly, more play.

Re: HuggingGPT: Solving AI tasks with ChatGPT and its friends in HuggingFace

#139
post #75

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Bro, GPT-4 can absolutely not understand new information. Try to teach it a grammar. It can't learn a grammar. Anyone can learn a new grammar. Not GPT-4. GPT-4 does not ask clarifying questions. It does not understand things.

I'm not sure why you think that? When I give it programming tasks, GPT-4 will ask all kinds of clarifying questions. Here is a trivial example: p: I want you to solve for x, giving me a numeric value, given the formula ax^2 + bx + c = 0. r: To find the numeric value of x for the quadratic equation ax^2 + bx + c = 0, we need to use the quadratic formula: x = (-b ± √(b^2 - 4ac)) / (2a) However, you haven't provided spe…

First, these are trivial examples. I would not classify "give me the values to this math formula" as clarifying questions.

Second, in response to "I'm not sure why you think that?" ask GPT why it often does not ask clarifying questions. It will explain to you why!

Third, I just asked GPT the most vague question on the planet: "I am trying to create a function that takes a value, and gives me a result using that value and another, separate external value, can you give me the correct solution to this using Python?"

And nowhere in its response did it try and ask WTF I was talking about (tho sure its responses are sensible - I am not saying GPT-4 is spewing nonsense)

Sure, I can help you with that! Here is an example function that takes two values, x and y, and returns their sum:

def add_values(x, y): result = x + y return result You can call this function with any two values you want, like this:

print(add_values(2, 3)) This will output 5, which is the sum of 2 and 3.

If you want to use an external value in your function, you can pass it in as a third argument, like this:

def add_values_with_external_value(x, y, external_value): result = x + y + external_value return result

You can call this function with the same two values as before, and an external value of your choice, like this:

print(add_values_with_external_value(2, 3, 10)) This will output 15, which is the sum of 2, 3, and 10.

Re: HuggingGPT: Solving AI tasks with ChatGPT and its friends in HuggingFace

#140
post #94

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What things can this tech do which scare you?

It not that this tech does things now that scare me. Now I am mostly exited. I believe my uneasiness stems from the unknown potential of this technology. Now, one could argue that that’s always the case for technology, so why do I feel uneasy now? I believe that this particular type of technology has a very large potential. I think most HN readers would agree. But I am not scared, yet. I’ll be scared when I know the…

I think part of it is you have a lot of idiots whoa re saying this is AGI. It isn't, and it isn't anywhere close to it.
Post reply on HN