I have the latter working on a M1 Macbook Air with very good results for what it is. Curious if bloomz.cpp is significantly better or just about the same.
Could you train a ChatGPT-beating model for $85k and run it in a browser?
11–20 of 175 posts
Re: Could you train a ChatGPT-beating model for $85k and run it in a browser?
#12It either runs locally or it runs on the cloud. Data could come from both locations as well. So it's mostly technically irrelevant if it's displaying in a browser or not.
Except when it comes to usability. I don't get it why people love software running in a browser. I often close important tools i have not saved when it's in a browser. I cant have offline tools which work if i am in a tunnel (living in Switzerland this is an issue) . Or it's incompatible because i am running LibreWolf.
/sorry to be nitpicking on this topic ;-)
Re: Could you train a ChatGPT-beating model for $85k and run it in a browser?
#13Re: Could you train a ChatGPT-beating model for $85k and run it in a browser?
#14Re: Could you train a ChatGPT-beating model for $85k and run it in a browser?
#15> My friends at Replicate told me that a simple rule of thumb for A100 cloud costs is $1/hour. AWS charges $32/hr for an 8xA100s (p4d.24xlarge) which comes out to $4/hour/gpu. Yes you can get lower pricing with a 3 year reservation but thats not what this question is asking. You also need 256 nodes to be colocated on the same fabric -- which AWS will do for you but only if you reserve for years.
Lambda labs charges about 11-12/hr for 8xA100.
Re: Could you train a ChatGPT-beating model for $85k and run it in a browser?
#164xA100 is 75k, 8 is 140k https://shop.lambdalabs.com/deep-learning/servers/hyperplane...
Re: Could you train a ChatGPT-beating model for $85k and run it in a browser?
#17Re: Could you train a ChatGPT-beating model for $85k and run it in a browser?
#18So cool it runs on a browser /sarcasm/ i might not even need a computer. Or internet when we are at it. It either runs locally or it runs on the cloud. Data could come from both locations as well. So it's mostly technically irrelevant if it's displaying in a browser or not. Except when it comes to usability. I don't get it why people love software running in a browser. I often close important tools i have not saved w…
If you read the article, part of the argument was for the sandboxing that the browser provides.
"Obviously if you’re going to give a language model the ability to execute API calls and evaluate code you need to do it in a safe environment! Like for example... a web browser, which runs code from untrusted sources as a matter of habit and has the most thoroughly tested sandbox mechanism of any piece of software we’ve ever created."
Re: Could you train a ChatGPT-beating model for $85k and run it in a browser?
#19If you could, you should have done it 6 months ago.
I don't think this is a very helpful statement because actually finding the idea on what to build is the hard part - or even just believing it's possible. The company I work at has been using NLP for years now and we have a model that's great at what we do... but if you asked if we could develop that into a chatbot as functional as chatgpt two years ago you'd probably be met with some pretty heavy skepticism.
Cloning something that has been proven possible is always easier than taking the risk building the first version with no real grasp of feasibility.
Re: Could you train a ChatGPT-beating model for $85k and run it in a browser?
#20If you have ~100k to spend, aren't there options to buy a gpu rather than just blow it all on cloud? How much is an 8xA100 machine? 4xA100 is 75k, 8 is 140k https://shop.lambdalabs.com/deep-learning/servers/hyperplane...
Ignoring the operational costs of on-prem hardware is pretty common, but those costs are significant and can greatly change the calculation.