If AI scaling is to be shut down, let it be for a coherent reason
21–30 of 475 posts
Re: If AI scaling is to be shut down, let it be for a coherent reason
#22Re: If AI scaling is to be shut down, let it be for a coherent reason
#23Re: If AI scaling is to be shut down, let it be for a coherent reason
#24Seems impossible. If making a nuclear weapon required merely a few branches of a willow tree and baking powder, regulation would be pretty hard. We would just have to live with the risks. It seems we will be at this level with AI at some point fairly soon.
Re: If AI scaling is to be shut down, let it be for a coherent reason
#25It's a little scary that a small private company could create an AI that has dominated headlines for over a month now. Surely, the folks at NSA, who have more data than anyone else, have taken notice and are working on something of their own.
Am I being paranoid about a potential tool that lists out a bunch of names and addresses for queries like "list of people who have said X about Y online"?
Re: If AI scaling is to be shut down, let it be for a coherent reason
#26Why are we even bothering talking about this? It's Gary Marcus "neural networks don't really work" suddenly discovering they do, and literally trying to shut down research in that area while keeping his prefered research areas funded. We know a bunch of the people whose names are on the letter didn't sign it (eg Yann Lecunn who said he disagreed with the premise and didn't sign it). I'm so offended by the idea of thi…
Down with these ** control freaks, so much of everything nowadays prioritizes safety over freedom. This time let's put freedom first.
Re: If AI scaling is to be shut down, let it be for a coherent reason
#27I read the times article, and I also watched Lex Fridman's talk with Eliezer Yudkowsky. Frankly I don't think he is qualified, and I don't understand why anyone is even giving him any credence. His argument is literally: > A mis-aligned super AGI will result in the death of humanity I ask, how . He is making reductive logical leaps that don't make sense. It's FUD.
Will Putin or terrorists hold back from using it in terrible ways if they have it available to them?
Re: If AI scaling is to be shut down, let it be for a coherent reason
#28Re: If AI scaling is to be shut down, let it be for a coherent reason
#29I read the times article, and I also watched Lex Fridman's talk with Eliezer Yudkowsky. Frankly I don't think he is qualified, and I don't understand why anyone is even giving him any credence. His argument is literally: > A mis-aligned super AGI will result in the death of humanity I ask, how . He is making reductive logical leaps that don't make sense. It's FUD.