Live data from Hacker News

Mach 3.5 Over Libya in an SR-71 Blackbird

thesr71blackbird.com

141–146 of 146 posts

Re: Mach 3.5 Over Libya in an SR-71 Blackbird

#141
post #98

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Winter means that your nearest pole is tilted away from the sun. Your half of the planet is cooler, especially towards the poles.

For instance the James Webb telescope gets clearer pictures in summer because in winter the astronauts breath can fog up the lens.

[deleted]

Re: Mach 3.5 Over Libya in an SR-71 Blackbird

#142

Earlier quoted context omitted.

mmm... to anyone who could read? I mean, could you say why us troops are in Syrian oil fields stealing oil?

Under the laws of what group is American presence in Syria illegal? Is it American laws? The UN? Syrian laws?

Both international law (the US has no UN mandate) and national/domestic Syrian law.

“End America’s Illegal Occupation of Syria Now: Our presence there is a violation of domestic and international law that’s made a horrible civil war even worse.”

https://www.cato.org/commentary/end-americas-illegal-occupat...

Re: Mach 3.5 Over Libya in an SR-71 Blackbird

#143

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>but then constantly demands the US be the world police Que?

Europe isn't even willing to fund their own militaries.

That's right, so you'd had to think outside the box and create demand

Re: Mach 3.5 Over Libya in an SR-71 Blackbird

#144
post #111

Earlier quoted context omitted.

legend is that president johnson got it confused in a press conference and called it the sr-71 so instead of correcting him they just changed the name. "skunk works" is a great read. i'm almost done with "area 51" by annie jacobsen and it's quite the interesting read as well, though it does get dry at times. https://openlibrary.org/works/OL15839422W/Area_51

The correct part of the legend is that the speech he was reading off of said SR-71, because someone thought it sounded better, and getting it spoken by the President was easier than doing it the "Right" way.

thank you. i really appreciate that clarification. it's always nice to learn new things.

Re: Mach 3.5 Over Libya in an SR-71 Blackbird

#145

Amazing what engineers were able to do (build aircraft like the SR-71) before computers came along and made them less productive.

I know you're being glib but I assume the reason we didn't do any more Blackbirds is because normal satellite imagery got good enough that it didn't make as much sense to keep building these crazy things. Does anyone remember that satellite photo Trump leaked of that iranian missile silo? https://www.npr.org/2019/08/30/755994591/president-trump-twe... This one ^ I'm just guessing that if they showed it to Trump unpro…

To be fair, we still fly recon missions with the U-2. Spy planes haven't entirely gone the way of the dodo, just the envelope-pushing madness that was the SR-71.

Re: Mach 3.5 Over Libya in an SR-71 Blackbird

#146
post #131

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Amazing aircraft. Never had the pleasure of seeing it in motion but I paid a special visit to see the one at the Imperial War Museum in Duxford outside London. Bloody brilliant, and I even broke the rules to touch it briefly with my hand to feel what it was like.

You gotta tell me, what did it feel like? :) It kinda looks, to my eyes at least, like it has a matte finish in photos, so my thinking would be that it would have perhaps an almost shark skin roughness or something? Though you'd imagine surely not given the bit of extra drag when factored over the whole airframe...maybe? But then again, at those speeds I wonder if there would be a difference or if boundary layer effe…

It was some years ago but I think you're spot on, it was exactly like that!
Post reply on HN