P4P: A Syntax Proposal (for Racket)
shriram.github.com
P4P: A Syntax Proposal (for Racket)
1–5 of 5 posts
Re: P4P: A Syntax Proposal (for Racket)
#2So now we will be counting tabs instead of parenthesis. I still prefer the latter.
Re: P4P: A Syntax Proposal (for Racket)
#3This has been discussed in length here: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1941373
Re: P4P: A Syntax Proposal (for Racket)
#4So now we will be counting tabs instead of parenthesis. I still prefer the latter.
This is not yet-another-proposal-to-pythonize-Lisp. The proposed syntax is hardly whitespace-sensitive, except for a few special situations.
Re: P4P: A Syntax Proposal (for Racket)
#5This has been discussed in length here: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1941373
An interesting read as well, and upvoted for that, but I fail to see how it qualifies as a substitute for the parent post. The proposed syntax is entirely different and especially the almost non-significance of whitespace is quite a difference from other proposals.