$52B Chipmaking Plan Is Racing Toward Failure
bloomberg.com
$52B Chipmaking Plan Is Racing Toward Failure
1–10 of 12 posts
Re: $52B Chipmaking Plan Is Racing Toward Failure
#2Re: $52B Chipmaking Plan Is Racing Toward Failure
#3Re: $52B Chipmaking Plan Is Racing Toward Failure
#4Good to know that “affordable, accessible, reliable and high-quality child care,” Is the reason that the $52bn is going to fail. Oh, and of course those pesky environmental laws.
Re: $52B Chipmaking Plan Is Racing Toward Failure
#5Good to know that “affordable, accessible, reliable and high-quality child care,” Is the reason that the $52bn is going to fail. Oh, and of course those pesky environmental laws.
Re: $52B Chipmaking Plan Is Racing Toward Failure
#6Re: $52B Chipmaking Plan Is Racing Toward Failure
#7Curiously absent from the article is any mention of how the democratic choices of Ohioans may have driven away potential talent at the new Intel plant. They may struggle to recruit top talent because top talent wouldn't want to live in an area with what they perceive as idiotic yokels as neighbors (who have more votes).
Re: $52B Chipmaking Plan Is Racing Toward Failure
#8Re: $52B Chipmaking Plan Is Racing Toward Failure
#9Curiously absent from the article is any mention of how the democratic choices of Ohioans may have driven away potential talent at the new Intel plant. They may struggle to recruit top talent because top talent wouldn't want to live in an area with what they perceive as idiotic yokels as neighbors (who have more votes).
Re: $52B Chipmaking Plan Is Racing Toward Failure
#10Good to know that “affordable, accessible, reliable and high-quality child care,” Is the reason that the $52bn is going to fail. Oh, and of course those pesky environmental laws.
I mean, this seems like a point simply made. As someone who has dealt with government bureaucracy WRT developing something, it is indeed a massive disincentive towards building. Maybe that's the whole point, but it seems like government is working against itself here by providing simultaneous incentives and disincentives.