Bootstrap 2.0, From Twitter • Hacker News Board

Re: Bootstrap 2.0, From Twitter

#31

Post by huxley » Wed, Feb 01, 2012, 4:04 AM UTC

rolleiflex wrote: post #22

I wonder why they have removed sortable tables. Not a hard thing to re-add if you need it, but why the hassle? I used them a lot as a designer as it is one of the most appreciated things for my clients from the desktop-application world who expect it as a given and disappointed when it's not available.

In the Google Group, Mark Otto mentioned that he didn't want to have it as a dependency (it was the only 3rd party plugin) and raised a concern with it having its own themes.

Re: Bootstrap 2.0, From Twitter

#32

Post by akazackfriedman » Wed, Feb 01, 2012, 4:05 AM UTC

That Kippt site... on Bootstrap... c'mon!!!!

Re: Bootstrap 2.0, From Twitter

#33

Post by jlazer » Wed, Feb 01, 2012, 4:13 AM UTC

This is great and all, but anyone have a link to the old documentation for 1.4? Don't want to upgrade quite yet.

Re: Bootstrap 2.0, From Twitter

#34

Post by danneu » Wed, Feb 01, 2012, 4:16 AM UTC

slewis wrote: post #17

Can someone compare and contrast Boostrap 2.0 with ZURB Foundation? I've been using Foundation for a new project and am really digging the responsive layout features.

I did a side-by-side of a simple design when trying to choose one. Bootstrap just has better defaults with things like padding, sizing, and margins. It just looked better.

Now that Bootstrap has responsive design, there's no contest.

Re: Bootstrap 2.0, From Twitter

#35

Post by ceejayoz » Wed, Feb 01, 2012, 4:18 AM UTC

jlazer wrote: post #33

This is great and all, but anyone have a link to the old documentation for 1.4? Don't want to upgrade quite yet.

You can view it locally. If you didn't already checkout from Git:

  git clone https://github.com/twitter/bootstrap.git
  cd bootstrap
  git checkout v1.4.0
  open docs/index.html

Re: Bootstrap 2.0, From Twitter

#36

Post by schpet » Wed, Feb 01, 2012, 4:21 AM UTC

> With Bootstrap 2, we've gone fully responsive.

This would imply a fluid grid, which it lacks.

http://www.zeldman.com/2011/07/06/responsive-design-i-dont-t...

Re: Bootstrap 2.0, From Twitter

#37

Post by mgkimsal » Wed, Feb 01, 2012, 4:27 AM UTC

jschuur wrote: post #30

mgkimsal wrote: post #29

they seem to have removed the few sample layouts they had before which you could copy/paste to start a full page. or am i missing that somewhere on the site?

http://twitter.github.com/bootstrap/examples.html ?

ummm... yeah - why didn't I see that before?

Thanks!

Re: Bootstrap 2.0, From Twitter

#38

Post by [deleted] » Wed, Feb 01, 2012, 4:33 AM UTC

[deleted]

Re: Bootstrap 2.0, From Twitter

#39

Post by JuanCBenavides » Wed, Feb 01, 2012, 4:36 AM UTC

Very nice indeed. I will consider Bootstrap for my next project. Very simple to implement.

Re: Bootstrap 2.0, From Twitter

#40

Post by spiralganglion » Wed, Feb 01, 2012, 4:38 AM UTC

nickbarnwell wrote: post #7

conroy wrote: post #4

The coolest new feature? Bootstrap 2.0 is completely responsive. This is what it looks like on different screen sizes: http://areyouresponsive.com/twitter.github.com%2Fbootstrap%2...

It may be my slow data connection, but it seems as though AreYouResponsive is not, in fact, responsive.

Here we go, recursion:

http://areyouresponsive.com/areyouresponsive.com/areyourespo...