Live data from Hacker News

Gpt4all: A chatbot trained on ~800k GPT-3.5-Turbo Generations based on LLaMa

github.com

1–10 of 314 posts

Re: Gpt4all: A chatbot trained on ~800k GPT-3.5-Turbo Generations based on LLaMa

#2
> Reverse a string in python.

> In Python, you can reverse a list or tuple by using the reversed() function on it. Here's an example of how to use this method with strings:

> my_string = "Hello World" # Define your original string here

reversed_str = my_string[::-1] # Use a slice and negative index for reverse order

print(reversed_str)

Hmm…

Re: Gpt4all: A chatbot trained on ~800k GPT-3.5-Turbo Generations based on LLaMa

#6

> Reverse a string in python. > In Python, you can reverse a list or tuple by using the reversed() function on it. Here's an example of how to use this method with strings: > my_string = "Hello World" # Define your original string here reversed_str = my_string[::-1] # Use a slice and negative index for reverse order print(reversed_str) Hmm…

dlrow olleh

Re: Gpt4all: A chatbot trained on ~800k GPT-3.5-Turbo Generations based on LLaMa

#7

Wow things are moving super fast, but it's scary that everything is being tainted by licensing. Super fun for research, but commercial endeavors are on shady grounds.

Da Vinci had no licenses. Nor Euclid, Nor Einstein.

In the long run, licenses are for losers.

Re: Gpt4all: A chatbot trained on ~800k GPT-3.5-Turbo Generations based on LLaMa

#8

Wow things are moving super fast, but it's scary that everything is being tainted by licensing. Super fun for research, but commercial endeavors are on shady grounds.

Hopefully someone will be brave enough to fight Meta on the LLaMA copyright issue. My concern is that the people who can afford a massive legal battle can also afford to train their own model.

Re: Gpt4all: A chatbot trained on ~800k GPT-3.5-Turbo Generations based on LLaMa

#10
post #7

Wow things are moving super fast, but it's scary that everything is being tainted by licensing. Super fun for research, but commercial endeavors are on shady grounds.

Da Vinci had no licenses. Nor Euclid, Nor Einstein. In the long run, licenses are for losers.

Yeah, and there's a reason none of those guys were as rich as e.g. Mark Zuckerburg.
Post reply on HN