Live data from Hacker News

Tell HN: I stopped caring about personal development in tech after seeing GPT-4

news.ycombinator.com

1–10 of 177 posts

Tell HN: I stopped caring about personal development in tech after seeing GPT-4

#1
As a C++/Networking enthusiast religiously following any new features and quirks in the language and also following several rfcs I have lost complete motivation for self improvement in terms of keeping my skills sharp due to the rapid AI takeover. I had an opportunity to see gpt4 in action on an inhouse product and I'm taken aback, it architects, generates tickets and starts writing code using feature / bug / spike branches for an embedded device a company is working on.

It can do almost everything I can do a bit better and I have years and years of domain knowledge, keep ontop of rfc changes, new languages, c++ standards etc, side projects and even occasional leetcode.

Oh well, this gold run did run on long enough - Im glad I made a bit of money from the industry but I think all these students going into CS are in for a rude awakening and we're in for a huge shift in this industry.

Re: Tell HN: I stopped caring about personal development in tech after seeing GPT-4

#3
Maybe. It currently can't do everything so the comparison isn't person vs LLM, it's person who uses LLM vs person who doesn't. And the people who do are much more productive. So by giving up, you're making yourself obsolete faster.

Will we ever get to the point where it does everything independently? No idea. But right now your reaction is premature.

Re: Tell HN: I stopped caring about personal development in tech after seeing GPT-4

#4
I have the opposite take... there's a program I use (and ties me to Windows) called WikidPad[1], it's a personal Wiki, written in Python. The win32 version works great, and because it's compiled (back in 2018), the binary should do so forever. The Linux distribution is source based, and broke when WxWidgets changed the name/nature of some key parameters to its calls.

I'm a Pascal programmer, not a Python programmer... but I'm hoping that I can leverage CoPilot to help me navigate the nitty gritty boilerplate that would otherwise take days to sort through, and get to the heart of the refactoring/patching necessary to get WikidPad up to date and fix the breakage.

I see GPT4 and kin as tools to allow more freedom of action, and less worry about the stuff I always hated anyway, the minutiae of coding.

--

>years of domain knowledge

Usually the term "domain knowledge" applies to real world non-programming knowledge such as chemistry, manufacturing, etc. This is the first time I've seen it applied to programming. Programming is just a means to an end. I've never considered programming to be an industry. We produce a product with zero marginal cost.

I suspect you are in the same emotional place that accountants were, the first time they saw spreadsheets in use. It must have seemed like the end of the world to them, but it wasn't.

>all these students going into CS are in for a rude awakening

As long as they know that computers are a tool, not the end result, they'll be fine

[1] https://wikidpad.sourceforge.net/

Re: Tell HN: I stopped caring about personal development in tech after seeing GPT-4

#5
For what it’s worth, I’ve been trying to verify the claim from Microsoft and OpenAI that we would get more software in the future when the price of software would decrease. In other words, they claim that there is a supply problem for software and not a demand problem.

So far, I find it a pretty extreme statement, but it appears true here in the Netherlands. Most employees that I talk to at various industries can immediately point out one or two things which they would like to see automated. In most cases, software would replace data transfers which now occur via spreadsheets or paper.

Re: Tell HN: I stopped caring about personal development in tech after seeing GPT-4

#6
I wouldn't worry. It's code output is 50% garbage. I'm not in fear of my job. All the hypsters assuming this will destroy lawyers, accountants, doctors etc clearly don't understand correctness isn't something they can just tag on to a prediction machine.
Post reply on HN