Earlier quoted context omitted.
Glad I work for a company where the CEO pays for everyones ChatGPT Plus for the devs. If you think your code is special then you're wrong.
You are still transferring your business data to an external entity, but on top of it you pay for it. And if you think that there is no special code then you're wrong.
Employees are feeding sensitive data to ChatGPT, raising security fears
221–230 of 355 posts
Re: Employees are feeding sensitive data to ChatGPT, raising security fears
#222Earlier quoted context omitted.
Does chatgpt plus collect data for training, or does it have more privacy than the free offering?
Replying to myself, it seems your data is still used, unless you fill in a google form to opt out: https://help.openai.com/en/articles/6950777-chatgpt-plus
Re: Employees are feeding sensitive data to ChatGPT, raising security fears
#223Earlier quoted context omitted.
Does chatgpt plus collect data for training, or does it have more privacy than the free offering?
Replying to myself, it seems your data is still used, unless you fill in a google form to opt out: https://help.openai.com/en/articles/6950777-chatgpt-plus
Re: Employees are feeding sensitive data to ChatGPT, raising security fears
#224Re: Employees are feeding sensitive data to ChatGPT, raising security fears
#225Re: Employees are feeding sensitive data to ChatGPT, raising security fears
#226We block ChatGPT, as do most federal contractors. I think it’s a horrible exploit waiting to happen: - there’s no way they’re manually scrubbing out sensitive data so its bound to spill out from the training data when prompting the model - OpenAI is openly storing all this data they’re collecting to the extent that they’ve had several leaks now where people can see others’ conversations and data. We are one step away…
Does US intelligence have access to OpenAI data? Private organizations is one thing. But with all the dopes in government positions around the world, OpenAI logs would probably be a treasure trove for intelligence gathering.
Re: Employees are feeding sensitive data to ChatGPT, raising security fears
#227Earlier quoted context omitted.
I just run it on my desktop? 64GB of DDR4 is <$150.
I'm assuming a quantized version?
Though RDIMMs on eBay are even cheaper than UDIMMs (just over $1/GB) and Broadwell-era Xeon workstations aren't that expensive if you want to run the unquantized version.
Re: Employees are feeding sensitive data to ChatGPT, raising security fears
#228Let’s not forget that we’re also feeding in all our code into OpenAI Codex.
And Github Copilot will gather that tiny amount of data to who knows where.
Re: Employees are feeding sensitive data to ChatGPT, raising security fears
#229Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think this is different in that ChatGPT is expressly using your data as training in a probabilistic model. This means: * Their contractors can (and do!) see your chat data to tune the model * If the model is trained on your confidential data, it may start returning this data to other users (as we've seen with Github Copilot regurgitating licensed software) * The site even _tells you_ not to put confidential data in…
Sticking it in your own datacenter doesn't really prevent any of these problems (except maybe #2), only now your leaks are internal and because of all the false sense of security, you might wind up leaking far more confidential and specific information (ie. an executive leaking to the rest of the team in advance that they are planning layoffs for noted reasons, whereas that executive might have used more vague terms…
Re: Employees are feeding sensitive data to ChatGPT, raising security fears
#230I guess another way to say that is, OpenAI (or another service provider with a better security track record) could broker this service in the cloud, with guarantees around not using the session data for RLHF, not storing session data, stronger auth (OpenAI has had a couple of incidents that show that they have pretty lax security in their backend), etc. and could make a killing selling or re-selling ChatGPT to businesses.